Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

New Tax Reform 401k Limits Clarification

Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:19 am
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 12:19 am
I see a lot of gnashing of teeth over the $2400 limit. Correct me if I am wrong, but why don’t you just contribute post-tax up to your company match and then just recharacterize into a Roth IRA with zero tax? This is of course if your employer does not offer a Roth 401k.

This may be beneficial either way to avoid the RMDs even on a Roth 401k. Tax pros help me out.
This post was edited on 10/30/17 at 12:20 am
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51873 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:16 am to
There are no rules, so its kinda hard to clarify anything, much less how to "work" the system.
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10379 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 4:48 am to
Trump said 401k limits are not changing and also a lot of us already max our Roth ira's.

Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3631 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 7:02 am to
I would think high income professionals are expecting to be in a lower tax bracket in retirement than they are now. I would rather most of my contributions be pre-tax at the moment.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 7:04 am to
I max my Roth regardless.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19577 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 8:32 am to
Yup same here. I dont see anyway this doesn't screw us.
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7895 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 8:48 am to
You pay taxes when you convert pretax money to Roth money, so there’s no gaming the system there.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 8:49 am to
I max my Roth as it is.

Fortunately my employer offers a Roth 401 and I suspect plenty of others will too if this becomes law.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 8:54 am to
Screw it. If this happens I'm buying farmland
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19577 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 9:24 am to
Count me in.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

I max my Roth as it is.

Fortunately my employer offers a Roth 401 and I suspect plenty of others will too if this becomes law.


Why bother even contributing to your Roth 401k when you can simply contribute post-tax money to your traditional 401k. You then recharacterize the post tax money into a Roth IRA much like a IRA conversion without limit? That way you avoid the RMD required with any 401k and you don’t have to worry about your limit in the Roth IRA.
This post was edited on 10/30/17 at 1:54 pm
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39545 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 1:57 pm to
quote:



Why bother even contributing to your Roth 401k when you can simply contribute post-tax money to your traditional 401k.


Wait wut?

How are you contributing post-tax money to a pre-tax vehicle?

Did you mean to say "Traditional IRA" and not "Traditional 401k"?
This post was edited on 10/30/17 at 1:59 pm
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

How are you contributing post-tax money to a pre-tax vehicle?


Seriously?!? Please tell me you’re joking...

Here is a simple article from 2015 when they changed the treatment of post-tax money in 401ks

LINK
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39545 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 9:22 pm to
Yes seriously. Mainly because for the most part, most folks haven't discussed the mega backdoor Roth option on here so I didn't see where you were going with that. My bad, I should have read closer.

In fact, you can see only a few posts on my history where I mention this option.

Though, to be fair, this option only works with certain 401ks as I understand, and I've never found one of mine that would allow the in service distribution for it to work, so while it exists, I'm not sure many would be able to execute it.

Outside of that, I still would prefer pre-tax contributions first, but who knows the regulations may get to the point that this little quirk may be the route to go.
This post was edited on 10/30/17 at 9:24 pm
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
36938 posts
Posted on 10/30/17 at 10:34 pm to
A few thoughts here.

1) I don't think tne limits will actually be lowered, so this is an academic discussion.

1A) If the limits were indeed lowered, you can bet your rear that the backdoor would be shut down. If they are desperate enough to go after tax dollars by lowering the pre-tax limit, they gonna go after everything including the backdoor.

2) The backdoor 401K trick only works if your plan accepts after-tax contributions. Not all plans do... in fact... I've seen more that don't than those that do.

3) The backdoor IRA is attractive because you can do it in real-time. The backdoor 401K you can't flip the switch on until you seperate (generally). If you work for a company for 20-30 more years, you can't backdoor until that time... when who knows if the backdoor will still be open, and/or what the tax rates are going to be at that time.

If the stars align... it's a sweet deal. But I don't think it's the slam dunk no-brainer that you imply it is.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51873 posts
Posted on 10/31/17 at 2:08 am to
quote:

If they are desperate enough to go after tax dollars by lowering the pre-tax limit, they gonna go after everything including the backdoor.


Why?

It seems like they would love for people to re characterize voluntarily their pre tax dollars to post tax dollars.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram