Started By
Message

Is there any excuse for not having 20% dp on 2nd home purchase?

Posted on 6/25/18 at 1:52 pm
Posted by LigerFan
Member since Jan 2014
2711 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 1:52 pm
Was talking with my brother this weekend and he mentioned looking for a new house to accommodate a his growing family (2 kids with one more on the way, 2 dogs). He has been in his current house about 4 years and purchased that with an FHA loan and 3.5% down. He and his wife are both public school teachers.

He said he will have about 10% to put down on this house purchase (includes cash on hand and equity in current house based on recent appraisal).

It's crazy to me that someone would want to get into a new home and not have adequate funding to get away from PMI or to have your current house well with no real proceeds from the sale after realtor commissions.

Is this a normal practice?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63853 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 1:57 pm to
Seems reasonable to me, especially with two school teacher salaries. 10% down is alot more than most people put down on a house.
Posted by tigersnipen
Member since Dec 2006
2085 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 2:00 pm to
Many people would never buy a house if required to have 20% down. In fact I bet the majority of new house buyers do not even put down 10%.
This post was edited on 6/25/18 at 2:01 pm
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12253 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 2:00 pm to
Normal practice for sure. Sometimes people have their money tied up in other areas, or they just don't have the opportunity to buy a house with much down. People don't want to rent forever and the only way they'd ever be able to afford a house is with less than 10% down. Definitely need to do everything they can to get the PMI off the note, and then can take it easy if they need to open up more liquidity.
Posted by Gondor
Jacksonville, Fl
Member since Nov 2004
969 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 2:02 pm to
Only if you use the proceeds from first house sale to eliminate you credit card debt.
Posted by Anfield Road
Liverpool Fan
Member since May 2012
1940 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 2:07 pm to
Living in a high cost of living area? Though, I had the same opinion as you when I was living in Mississippi and Alabama.
Posted by LigerFan
Member since Jan 2014
2711 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Living in a high cost of living area?


Nope, they live in Prarieville.

Didn't think it was as common as everyone is making it out to be, even with purchasing home #2
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Is this a normal practice?




Very much normal for the past 20 or so years since Clinton did away with capital gains on sales of personal residences.

Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7897 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Didn't think it was as common as everyone is making it out to be, even with purchasing home #2


Most people are shitty with money...

Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 3:40 pm to
I don't really see it as being shitty with money in every situation. I think it's more Americans are entitled and think because they have a couple of kids they need a 4br, 3ba house, at minimum. 10% on a $200k house is still $20k, and that's more than most Americans have saved, though some of that is in equity.

And I say that as someone with 2 kids and lives in a 5br, 4 1/2 ba house. Way more house than we need, but it was a steal on the foreclosure market and we closed with ~$50k in equity 16 years ago.
This post was edited on 6/25/18 at 3:41 pm
Posted by HYDRebs
Houston
Member since Sep 2014
1241 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 3:42 pm to
PMI can be relatively cheap. I don't really understand why it gets such a terrible stigma. It effectively prices in risk on the borrower. Ideally do you want it no, but not every situation is ideal. Coming up with 20% can be difficult especially with young families or in cases when you are buying another home and don't have your primary home sold yet.

Hell in good markets in good years that .1-2.0 (total range of PMI) can look like a great decision if your home is appreciating at or above average.


Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63853 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 3:47 pm to
I put 3% down with lender paid pmi at 4.75% 360.

Am I shitty with money?

You’re better than this Finley.
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5844 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:01 pm to
i have been a loan officer for 15yrs its been the normal practice for 70% of my customers .
Posted by Brian Wilson
Member since Mar 2012
2016 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:14 pm to
You can pre-pay it. I put 10% down and pre-paid PMI on my last house purchase. The up front lump sum was well less than what I would have paid total per month until I had an LTV low enough to have PMI removed so I viewed it as a win.
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2576 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:26 pm to
Great question. I would definitely argue he is not selling in the sweet spot. That is to say, he has not gained enough equity in the home likely to break-even with the sum of closing costs of the purchase of the original home and the realtors fees of selling the home.
Posted by Jake_LaMotta
Coral Gables
Member since Sep 2017
5700 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 4:52 pm to
In hot markets sellers are not paying any closing costs.
In hot markets with little inventory it is stupid to put down 20% if you don’t have to you can put the remaining 10% where it can grow
In hot markets where homes are appreciating at 10% to 15% per year right now pmi can be removed in a matter of two years.
You can sell after 2 years in a hot market and pay no taxes and pmi isn’t a factor really.

Several reasons to not put 20% down if you are in a desired area and are planning to sell in 2 or 3 years if the market stays strong. Most of these are in town areas in major cities not out in rural areas like I suspect many on here live in.
This post was edited on 6/25/18 at 4:54 pm
Posted by AUtigerNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2011
17107 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 5:01 pm to
4 years he probably did not make much of a dent into principal with FHA loan. You would have to sell the house way above what you bought it for. Unless you get lucky, I think 20% would be hard to come by depending on the next house they are trying to purchase and your current liquidity and spending habits.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162190 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Only if you use the proceeds from first house sale to eliminate you credit card debt.


Or for a cushion

If putting 10% down instead of 20% gives them a 30-40K cushion with some liquidity that's a lot of peace of mind
Posted by Jake_LaMotta
Coral Gables
Member since Sep 2017
5700 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

If putting 10% down instead of 20% gives them a 30-40K cushion with some liquidity that's a lot of peace of mind


Another good point.
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
7897 posts
Posted on 6/25/18 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

I put 3% down with lender paid pmi at 4.75% 360.

Am I shitty with money?


Maybe. I get that not everyone can fork out 20% but 3% is awfully low. You ain't even tryin.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram