Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

457 vs 403b

Posted on 8/4/18 at 8:23 pm
Posted by TypoKnig
Member since Aug 2011
8928 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 8:23 pm
Is there any advantage of one over the other? Should I max out one and just ignore the other or equally fund both?

Ideally I would max out both if I can swing it.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15742 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 8:54 pm to
The 457 is more accessible down the line.

You can take the money out with no penalty before 59.5 years old.

Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39553 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 9:49 pm to
What he said. I think the 457 is far superior to a 401k/403b.

One small caveat.

A 457 is subject to creditors if it's a nonprofit. Therefore, if you work at a nonprofit that has the 457, there is a risk (could be super small, but real) that if it goes under you can lose your 457 assets.

If your 457 is from a state government entity, then it enjoys the same protection from your organization's creditors like a 401k/403b enjoys, and is not subject to creditors.

Just a weird little twist.
This post was edited on 8/4/18 at 9:50 pm
Posted by SurfOrYak
BR/MsDelta
Member since Jul 2015
402 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 10:31 pm to
My decision would be based on the companies and funds that are available to invest in. I always look for participants like Fidelity and Vanguard (very low expenses) versus insurance companies. And this is supposed to be for your retirement, so the fact that you can make early withdrawals should be the last thing on your mind...
This post was edited on 8/4/18 at 10:33 pm
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39553 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

so the fact that you can make early withdrawals should be the last thing on your mind...



Not necessarily.

If he wants to "early" retire it would be wise to fund the 457 before the 401k to avoid the 10% penalty on withdrawal.

Also, life doesn't always work out so again, I'd rather have the funds prioritized in a manner I can access them if I absolutely have to

Lastly, the fund choices are going to be the same between them, so no advantage there.
This post was edited on 8/4/18 at 11:01 pm
Posted by TypoKnig
Member since Aug 2011
8928 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 10:58 pm to
Thanks folks. It seemed like the main difference was when one can access their money but wanted to make sure I wasnt missing anything.

Thanks again
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15742 posts
Posted on 8/5/18 at 9:24 am to
I have all sorts of retirement acccounts and have never accessed them or taken loans.

BUT, if life resulted in the need for cash, I’m glad I have a 457 and a Roth which allow easier access prior to 59.5.

I agree that retirement money should be left alone. BUT things can happen that might change ones circumstances dramatically.

Not for a vacation. Or college. But for a devastating life event.
Posted by iknowmorethanyou
Paydirt
Member since Jul 2007
6545 posts
Posted on 8/5/18 at 10:16 am to
Can usually take a 72(t) withdrawal to avoid the 10% penalty. The downside is it may not provide enough cash flow.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram