View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?
Posted by LSUFanMizeWay on 2/10/18 at 11:31 am719
(no message)
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by ShermanTxTiger on 2/10/18 at 11:32 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Coach Zero and it isn't even close.
There was good reason to hire all the others. None for Zero. (other than he talks like us)
There was good reason to hire all the others. None for Zero. (other than he talks like us)
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by VerbalKint on 2/10/18 at 11:32 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Eddie O
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by Kalameet on 2/10/18 at 11:33 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Going on a message board to bitch about an overused topic will not change anything.
Ever.
Seriously. Im not a fan of O. But lurking the board before I made an account was like slogging through a swamp.
Ever.
Seriously. Im not a fan of O. But lurking the board before I made an account was like slogging through a swamp.
This post was edited on 2/10 at 11:34 am
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by EmperorGout on 2/10/18 at 11:33 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Orgeron had one of the worst HC records in SEC history when he was offered what was at the time widely considered a top ten job
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by TNTigerman on 2/10/18 at 11:34 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Do you really have to "aks"?
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by Lsupimp on 2/10/18 at 11:34 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Mike Archer was worse because of who they turned down- Steve Spurrier and Mike Shanahan for starters.
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by S on 2/10/18 at 11:36 am to LSUFanMizeWay
DiNardo shouldn’t be in that group son.
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by TigerFanInSouthland on 2/10/18 at 11:36 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Ed Orgeron, at least people wanted the others. Orgeron tried to get an interview at Syracuse and they turned him down. The fact we hired that clown blows my mind. He was 11-25 overall and 3-21 in the SEC in his only other coaching gig. There’s a reason he couldn’t get hired for 10 years before our dumbasses hired him.
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by 1609tiger on 2/10/18 at 11:36 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Well on paper O is the least qualified. That doesn’t mean he turns out to be the worst. Archer took over a good program and ran it in the ground.
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
Advertisement
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by LSUFanMizeWay on 2/10/18 at 11:37 am to Lsupimp
Always wondered what Shanahan & Spurrier would've done in Purple & Gold.
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by Geauxgurt on 2/10/18 at 11:38 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Archer was a whiz kid as a DC and proven himself in that capacity. He was young which was the risk.
Hallman had proven himself successful at Southern Miss even if it was mostly due to Favre.
DiNardo proved himself as a coordinator and then while his record at Vandy wasn’t great, it was a legit success in terms of where they were before he got there.
O is the only one that was a proven massive failure as a head coach and never been in charge of either side of the ball.
Easily he is the worst hire.
Hallman had proven himself successful at Southern Miss even if it was mostly due to Favre.
DiNardo proved himself as a coordinator and then while his record at Vandy wasn’t great, it was a legit success in terms of where they were before he got there.
O is the only one that was a proven massive failure as a head coach and never been in charge of either side of the ball.
Easily he is the worst hire.
This post was edited on 2/10 at 11:40 am
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by LSUFanMizeWay on 2/10/18 at 11:38 am to S
He struggled at Vanderbilt & was only offered the job after The Pat Sullivan fiasco.
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by Bestbank Tiger on 2/10/18 at 11:39 am to Lsupimp
quote:
Mike Archer was worse because of who they turned down- Steve Spurrier and Mike Shanahan for starters.
If Herman turns out to be the next Spurrier, that will change.
O is the worst decision of the three. Archer was a promotion from within. There are other highly successful coaches (like Osborne) who were promoted from within. Hallman was a young up and comer. Just like Urban Meyer. A lot if schools would have taken him.
O was a catastrophic failure at his previous gig. Only one coach (Stallings) won a title after being fired from an earlier gig, and at least he had a conference title under his belt.
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by Freauxzen on 2/10/18 at 11:40 am to LSUFanMizeWay
O is one of the most questionable hires of all time in college football, so O by a significant margin.
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by NAsh-vegas Tigah on 2/10/18 at 11:46 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Zero without question. Lazy incompetent AD
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by tiger chaser on 2/10/18 at 11:48 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Curley Hallman
When LSU hired Archer that had more wins in the previous 4 seasons than at any time in LSU history (1984-1987) and they had Steve Spurrier begging for the gig. If people can’t see how that is worse than bumbling the transition from Les to Orgeron I can’t help them .
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by Ponchy Tiger on 2/10/18 at 11:48 am to LSUFanMizeWay
1. Orgeron
2. Archer
3. DiNardo
4. Hallman
Based upon their accomplishments at the time of the hire.
2. Archer
3. DiNardo
4. Hallman
Based upon their accomplishments at the time of the hire.
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?Posted by tiger chaser on 2/10/18 at 11:49 am to TigerFanInSouthland
Majority saying O probably to damn young to even know what it was like with the other coaches
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News