- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "...we were a bad kicker away from a locked up 14th national championship."
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:21 pm to RammerJammerBammer
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:21 pm to RammerJammerBammer
quote:
No Richardson, LSU wins AT LEAST 6-3
See how hard that was.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:23 pm to RammerJammerBammer
quote:
ok but Jefferson made all the gamechanging plays.
Too bad bama didn't have any players that could make game changing plays - well, except for their kickers.
What happened to TR in the second half?
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:25 pm to RammerJammerBammer
Bammers throughout history
Flashback to 2010
Flashback to 2008
Flashback to 1994
Flashback to 1993
Flashback to 1977
Flashback to 2010
quote:
Anybody who watched that game should have clearly seen that the only difference in the 2 teams was Cam Newton's mobility. I dont know why yall are taking that as an insult, its a damn compliment. (besides FG kicking) but w/o Newton we wouldnt have needed a kicker
Flashback to 2008
quote:
Anybody who watched that game should have clearly seen that the only difference in the 2 teams was Timothy Tebow's mobility. I dont know why yall are taking that as an insult, its a damn compliment. (besides FG kicking) but w/o Tebow we wouldnt have needed a kicker
Flashback to 1994
quote:
Anybody who watched that game should have clearly seen that the only difference in the 2 teams was Danny Wuerffel's arm. I dont know why yall are taking that as an insult, its a damn compliment. (besides FG kicking) but w/o Wuerffel we wouldnt have needed a kicker
Flashback to 1993
quote:
Anybody who watched that game should have clearly seen that the only difference in the 2 teams was Terry Dean's arm. I dont know why yall are taking that as an insult, its a damn compliment. (besides FG kicking) but w/o Dean we wouldnt have needed a kicker
Flashback to 1977
quote:
Anybody who watched that game should have clearly seen that the only difference in the 2 teams was Randy Garcia's mobility. I dont know why yall are taking that as an insult, its a damn compliment. (besides quarterbacking [Jeff Rutledge]) but w/o Garcia we wouldnt have needed a quarterback
This post was edited on 11/10/11 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:27 pm to RammerJammerBammer
quote:
Skewed because of jefferson and the option.
So you couldn't stop it
quote:
not like it was just pounding it at us all game
But then it didn't matter? Lolz
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:34 pm to gbalsamo4
Richardson had that one carry for 24 yards in the fourth quarter. On his other 11 second-half carries he gained a total of 12 yards, which prompted the "LSU is stoning TR" comments by Verne and Gary.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:35 pm to biglego
quote:
That was too long to read.
No it wasn't. I hear this sort of thing all the time. What are you, eight? Do some of you really read virtually nothing? If so, that is disturbing.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:37 pm to TheDoc
lol... how much yall wanna bet nick saban has an option package in his offense next year??
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:37 pm to liquid rabbit
Thank you, good sir. It is like you can set your watch to it. The difference in the game was Brandon Cox, Matt Jones, Chris Todd, Mitch Mustain . . . always something.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:38 pm to beenHADdat
quote:
lol... how much yall wanna bet nick saban has an option package in his offense next year??
I think PSU would be happy to run some option next year.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:39 pm to therick711
quote:
so everyone who has a problem with the way LSU won needs to just get over it ......and they make medicine for those who cant
bump
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:47 pm to RammerJammerBammer
quote:
Skewed because of jefferson and the option. not like it was just pounding it at us all game. Jefferson was THE difference in the game period. No jefferson, bama wins AT LEAST 6-3
There are many delusional LSU that deny this...thank god Les worked him back in the lineup.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 3:54 pm to gbalsamo4
quote:Thank you for the analysis backing up what I already thought I knew.
My point is that Alabama did not lose because their kickers missed low percentage kicks.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Now - I know this has nothing to do with this thread however I would like some enlighten on the following:
I need (would like to have) an explanation concerning the grounding penalty.
Example 1. You have the ball on the 35 yard line 3rd and 10. You drop back and your are sacked on the 30 yd line. It is now 4th and 15 from the 30 yd. line.
Example 2. You have the ball on the 35 yard line 3rd and 10. You drop back and you are being sacked on the 30 yd line but are able to get the ball away and there is no receiver in the area or did not get the ball passed the line of scrimmage thus you are flagged for grounding. The penalty is loss of down. It is now 4th and 15 from the 30 yd. line. (Same as example 1)
Where is the penalty? Why not get rid of the ball? The referee might blow a call in which case you would have the ball 4th and 10 from the 35 yd. line rather than the 30. The only detriment I can see is the risk of being called a fumble which may be high enough not to try and dump the ball. What am I missing (besides brains and football knowledge)?
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:03 pm to therick711
quote:
I think PSU would be happy to run some option next year.
Or do ANYTHING it takes to make it all go away.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:08 pm to gbalsamo4
Nick Satan is such a good liar that he has lied again and convinced his team that they were the better team despite the scoreboard, and also convinced them that kicking and field position do not compute into "who is the better team."

Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:16 pm to mike76tiger
RBJ IS SUCH A PUSSY, i CAN;T READ THIS shite ANY MORE.

Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:18 pm to mike76tiger
those kicks he put up wouldn't have been good from anywhere on any field... Just ugly.. 
Posted on 11/10/11 at 5:45 pm to West Central Tiger
quote:
I need (would like to have) an explanation concerning the grounding penalty.
The rule is intended to prevent QBs from getting rid of the ball when a sack is imminent.
quote:
Where is the penalty? Why not get rid of the ball?
Getting rid of the ball by throwing to an area of the field with a receiver in the vicinity is a lot easier said than done. Aimlessly tossing the ball in the air each time a QB is pressured would result in a high number of interceptions. Taking the time to scan the field, locate a receiver, and throw a pass far enough away that the defender cannot make a play on the ball, but close enough that the offensive player is considered in the area, would result in a high number of fumbles with QBs being hit when the ball is unprotected (due either to their inability to detect the hit or them not having enough time to release the ball forward before contact). The risk/reward is typically not worth taking the chance. The best case scenario is that the pass is incomplete and you do not lose yardage/the clock stops. The worst case scenario is that you lose the football with no one between the defense and your endzone. Somewhere in between is the situation you described. I believe teams now have the option to accept a penalty and may elect to have 10 seconds run off of the game clock inside of the final minute of the half. This is another reason why risk may outweigh reward.
The NFL rule is different from the NCAA rule and probably makes more sense to you given your example. The rule in the NFL is the spot of the foul OR 10 yards, whichever is greater. So in your example, the sack would result in 4th and 15 from the 30 while the intentional grounding penalty would result in 4th and 20 from the 25.
And don't forget that a QB may the throw the ball away as long he is outside of the "tackle box" and the ball crosses the line of scrimmage.
This post was edited on 11/10/11 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 11/10/11 at 5:48 pm to gbalsamo4
quote:
"...we were a bad kicker away from a locked up 14th national championship."
Show up with a complete team next team.
End debate.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 6:00 pm to Camp Randall
quote:
quote:
Skewed because of jefferson and the option. not like it was just pounding it at us all game. Jefferson was THE difference in the game period. No jefferson, bama wins AT LEAST 6-3
There are many delusional LSU that deny this...thank god Les worked him back in the lineup.
Without JJ, Mettenburger comes in and we win 24-6!
Back to top


0





