Started By
Message

Question to throw out there regarding the offense

Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:01 am
Posted by evantiger
stanford
Member since Nov 2007
362 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:01 am
Obviously, Brennan is no Burrow and any Tiger fan knew that going into this season. Also , Brennan is absolutely no threat to run with the ball so no need to stay in RPO. I have to say it, but the strength of this offense is your running backs in Emery, Price and Curry. Obviously, the line has got to get better in opening holes but here is the question and its scary to even ask but at this juncture and based upon your QB, do you scrap this offense and go back to the Meerkat offense of Les Miles. Please don't kill the messenger LOL, just putting this out there for discussion.
This post was edited on 9/28/20 at 9:04 am
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58540 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:03 am to
quote:

no need to stay in RPO


quote:

do you scrap this offense and go back to the Meerkat offense of Les Miles.


Oh geez.
Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3028 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:05 am to
If the strength of our offense is the running backs, then we’re in trouble from the performance they had Saturday.
This post was edited on 9/28/20 at 9:06 am
Posted by 1badboy
In space
Member since Jul 2014
8103 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:05 am to
I figured the offense would struggle early but lets face it the defense SUCKED !!!
Posted by evantiger
stanford
Member since Nov 2007
362 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:06 am to
Hey Bruh, I politely just said don't kill the messenger. LOL. Just give your opinion about the running backs and how Brennan can run the RPO. Don't need the emojis my dear Tiger friend,, Just answer the question. Thank you in advance.
Posted by LSUfan00
Member since Sep 2016
399 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:07 am to
No! Change would be a terrible idea. Notice the offense was rolling with the run was effective and we worked playaction off of that. That needs to be the style.
Posted by Cs
Member since Aug 2008
10463 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Also , Brennan is absolutely no threat to run with the ball so no need to stay in RPO.


The QB keep on a RPO is really the third option, and not one that's really required.

The entire point of executing all running plays out of an RPO is that you can freeze linebackers and safeties on passing plays, allowing for receivers to run free and gain an advantage in coverage. They see what looks to be a hand off, hesitate a bit, realize it's a pass, then try to recover. That split second pays off enormously when it comes to WRs getting open.

This also works in reverse - if the safeties are playing higher, the QB can read this and hand the ball off. It's a way to keep the defense honest.

Having a mobile QB is an added benefit, but not a requirement.

Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41495 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:09 am to
quote:

figured the offense would struggle early but lets face it the defense SUCKED !!!



Thank you. The offense put up 34 points in that horrendous showing. With just a little improvement they score 45-50ish easily. If the defense had played football during the game, we would’ve only needed 21 points to win the game.

Let’s not pretend this loss is squarely on MB and the offense.
Posted by evantiger
stanford
Member since Nov 2007
362 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:10 am to
I guess i misspoke when saying that the strength is in the running backs because you are correct , it just seems that something will have to be done with the offense to bolster Brennan's strengths because it looks like he is having trouble with the RPO.
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44536 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Also , Brennan is absolutely no threat to run with the ball so no need to stay in RPO.


RPO isn't really about the QB running the ball. and I don't know that we run much RPO anyway (might be good to do more actually).
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44536 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:11 am to
quote:

The offense put up 34 points in that horrendous showing.


actually they put up 27, the defense put up 7.
Posted by evantiger
stanford
Member since Nov 2007
362 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:12 am to
Thank you there Cs , very good analysis and see what you talking about. Thank you my dear Tiger friend.
Posted by BentonTiger7
Benton, LA
Member since Sep 2011
2297 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:15 am to
How do people not get that you don't need a mobile QB to the RPO? A QB that runs a 6 second 40 could be effective in the RPO if he has good, quick decision making and an accurate arm. I absolutely think we should run a lot of RPO.
Posted by jvargas
Member since Feb 2019
957 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:15 am to
Hot new take.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41495 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:18 am to
quote:

actually they put up 27, the defense put up 7.

I forgot about that. I still stand by my point though.
Posted by bstew3006
318
Member since Dec 2007
12571 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Obviously, Brennan is no Burrow and any Tiger fan knew that going into this season. Also , Brennan is absolutely no threat to run with the ball so no need to stay in RPO. I have to say it, but the strength of this offense is your running backs in Emery, Price and Curry. Obviously, the line has got to get better in opening holes but here is the question and its scary to even ask but at this juncture and based upon your QB, do you scrap this offense and go back to the Meerkat offense of Les Miles. Please don't kill the messenger LOL, just putting this out there


I think defenses will be more aggressive against LSU, so you still need the RPO...have to attack the middle of the field as LBs will blitz more.

Brennan was pressing and very hesitant on a lot of throws, however, when it was a quick read...he looked good. Just needs to pull the trigger!

May see more screens this year as well

quote:

Brennan is absolutely no threat to run with the ball so no need to stay in RPO


RPO isn’t about a running QB, it’s to get the LBs to react to run and open up the middle for a quick pass.
This post was edited on 9/28/20 at 9:21 am
Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3028 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:39 am to
quote:

it just seems that something will have to be done with the offense to bolster Brennan's strengths because it looks like he is having trouble with the RPO.

The thing that needs to happen is the running back being a threat to run it, and to not do ones where Brennan is the runner.

Burrow did that to great effect vs Florida, for instance. It worked because Clyde was a big threat that game.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7464 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:58 am to
quote:

If the strength of our offense is the running backs, then we’re in trouble from the performance they had Saturday.



the RBs averaged over 4 yards a carry.
not record breaking, but definitely not terrible either.
Posted by Chimlim
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
17712 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 9:59 am to
quote:

you scrap this offense and go back to the Meerkat offense of Les Miles


Never.
Posted by geauxjo
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2004
14675 posts
Posted on 9/28/20 at 10:00 am to
quote:


If the strength of our offense is the running backs, then we’re in trouble from the performance they had Saturday.


We only ran the ball 27 times. For over 100 yards. That’s right at 4 yards a carry. I’d say we have no clue what our rbs can do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram