- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Problems at Left Guard?
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:31 am to thunderbird1100
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:31 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Still cant fricking answer the question after being asked a billion times.
Says it all.
I literally just answered that who gave up the sacks is irrelevant. Did that go over your head or something?
1
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:32 am to RB10
quote:
I literally just answered that who gave up the sacks is irrelevant.
Thanks for finally showing us you just have no clue what you're talking about.
But hey, let us all know how much the OL sucked last year that we all already didn't know
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:33 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
RogerTheShrubber
Is there a reason you can't provide all of this evidence and have to resort to trying to take everyone's attention away from your comment?
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:33 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Still cant fricking answer the question after being asked a billion times.
Says it all.
He's literally saying there can be no improvement when we have actual variables that signify improvement.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:34 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Thanks for finally showing us you just have no clue what you're talking about.
I'm sorry, but depth on the offensive line when we don't even know who the 5 starters will be isn't important?
That's a pretty odd stance to take.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He's literally saying there can be no improvement when we have actual variables that signify improvement.
Hope and pray is the variable you're using to claim improvement.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:36 am to RB10
quote:
Is there a reason you can't provide all of this evidence
It's been listed, you just can't understand it
This is football, not some MBA class that doesn't apply to the sport.
You're literally stuck in the past and can't escape
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:38 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It's been listed, you just can't understand it
More experience automatically equals better performance, right?
It's odd that you make this claim while also saying Emery will be better than Brossette or CEH.
quote:
This is football, not some MBA class that doesn't apply to the sport.
You're literally stuck in the past and can't escape
Nah. I just don't take what I hope will happen to mean that it will happen.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:42 am to RB10
quote:
It's odd that you make this claim while also saying Emery will be better than Brossette or CEH.
And you can't understand why that's not at odds
Emory will be better year 2 than year one
There are offensive linemen that will be better than the ones we gave but they need .. wait for it... experience
So does Emory. He will be a factor this season and surpass the rest of the guys. Clyde is simply a third down Back.
Btw: RB is the easiest position to transition.
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 10:46 am
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:46 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
And you can't understand why that's not at odds
No I fully understand that you want experience to matter, when it suits your opinion. When it doesn't, it can be discarded.
quote:
There are offensive linemen that will be better than the ones we gave but they need .. wait for it... experience
So does Emory. He will be a factor this season and surpass the rest of the guys. Clyde is simply a third down Back.
Btw: RB is the easiest position to transition.
Case in point.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:47 am to RB10
quote:
that you want experience to matter
Only an idiot would think otherwise.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:48 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Only an idiot would think otherwise.
Only an idiot would believe that players have never performed worse even with more experience.
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 10:48 am
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:50 am to LSU GrandDad
We need TWO more interior linemen to commit for 2020. This is why.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:53 am to RB10
quote:
Only an idiot would believe that more experienced players have never performed worse.
You're the only person who has said that
Nothing in life is guaranteed, but the odds are in our favor.
Plus, offensive changes designed to help the line
We are in a good spot
Posted on 8/12/19 at 10:56 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You're the only person who has said that
No, I didn't.
quote:
Nothing in life is guaranteed, but the odds are in our favor
So you admit you're making assumptions based on what you hope will happen.
What happened to that "evidence"?
quote:
Plus, offensive changes designed to help the line
More assumptions based on what you hope will happen.
quote:
We are in a good spot
We hope.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:01 am to RB10
quote:
So you admit you're making assumptions based on what you hope will happen.
No, most likely to happen.
You're under the impression that last years production plus vague shite you heard in a scrimmage means it's doomed
But you're a fatalist.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:03 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No, most likely to happen.
More hope.
quote:
You're under the impression that last years production plus vague shite you heard in a scrimmage means it's doomed
And you're under the impression that experience = more guaranteed production.
quote:
But you're a fatalist.
This will get you a lot further than being a blind optimist.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:03 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Point is, I'm taking the stats from a scrimmage and seeing the same things we saw last year.
Can you point out the issues I need this scrimmage?
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Can you point out the issues I need this scrimmage?
Less than 5 sacks. Pretty simple.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 11:05 am to RB10
quote:
Less than 5 sacks. Pretty simple.
Can you explain these sacks? Who got beat?
Who "touched" the QB?
Was the QB running? Passing? First team? Third?
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 11:07 am
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News