- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Problems at Left Guard?
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:09 pm to thunderbird1100
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:09 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
You've said it throughout the thread, it's 100% apart of your "opinion".
Correct. It didn't "help" form it, because the opinion was already formed.
Hence the "sort of" in terms of you getting it.
1
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:11 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Inbetween bad info and no info is a huge spectrum.
Yeah, well we aren't getting any of that stuff in between. The point is you don't know if the information I'm using is bad or not.
Like I just told Thunderbird, I'm taking the little bit of information we have and using it. You can ignore it all you want.
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:15 pm to RB10
quote:
well we aren't getting any of that stuff in between. The point is you don't know if the information I'm using is bad or not.
Neither do you which is why it's a shitty assumption based on mostly unknown factors. That's exactly what Tbird has been trying to explain to you
You're getting there..
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Neither do you which is why it's a shitty assumption based on mostly unknown factors.
Taking and using the only available information from a scrimmage doesn't make it a "shitty assumption".
If they had released that Emery ran for 200 yards and 3 TDs, you wouldn't think your opinion that Emery is better than Brossette was a "shitty assumption". You'd think your opinion was validated.
What I'm doing is no different. You and Thunderbird just don't like my opinion. I really couldn't care less, but watching you two throw a bitch fit over my opinion has been amusing.
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:19 pm to RB10
quote:
Well, I hate to break it to you, but we aren't going to get specific stats
Therefore, and say it with me, MAYBE dont use that information if there's no context behind it
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:19 pm to RB10
quote:
Correct. It didn't "help" form it, because the opinion was already formed.
Your semantics need a lot of working on
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:20 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You're getting there..
I dont think he is
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:20 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Therefore, and say it with me, MAYBE dont use that information is there's no context behind it
I choose to use whatever information is available. Ignoring data because you don't like it isn't any better than what I'm doing.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:20 pm to RB10
quote:
Taking and using the only available information from a scrimmage doesn't make it a "shitty assumption".
Yes it does, because making an assumption based on limited information is ALWAYS terrible. You simply dont have enough facts from what was said about the scrimmage.
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:21 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Your semantics need a lot of working on
Your grasp of the concepts of forming vs. reaffirming an opinion need a lot of work.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:23 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Yes it does, because making an assumption based on limited information is ALWAYS terrible. You simply dont have enough facts from what was said about the scrimmage.
Because ignoring information that is provided isn't terrible?
I'm not going to get in lockstep with you that the scrimmage stats are completely meaningless so it's probably best that you get over that.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:25 pm to RB10
quote:
Taking and using the only available information from a scrimmage doesn't make it a "shitty assumption".
Jesus Christ.. unbelievable.
.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:25 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
I dont think he is
Yep, one forward, six back
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:31 pm to RB10
quote:
I choose to use whatever information is available. Ignoring data because you don't like it isn't any better than what I'm doing.
More like using vague data like the bible is just flat out not intelligent.
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:32 pm to RogerTheShrubber
You two drama queens really that frustrated because a person has the audacity to think there might still be issues with the offensive line? You disagree with him. We know. There is never a problem and anyone who thinks there even might be is an idiot and hates the coach. Can you shut up now
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:32 pm to RB10
quote:
Because ignoring information that is provided isn't terrible?
The information is vague, we've gone over this.
Again, you sell all your stocks if someone said the stock market is going down? Or would you actually want to know what YOUR stocks look like?
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:33 pm to Chet Donnely
quote:
You two drama queens really that frustrated because a person has the audacity to think there might still be issues with the offensive line? You disagree with him. We know. There is never a problem and anyone who thinks there even might be is an idiot and hates the coach. Can you shut up now
I think there's still a huge question mark on the OL, that's not what's in question here, it's more of using vague things like "We gave up 5 sacks in a scrimmage" with ZERO context behind that to back up a "point". Nobody is arguing last year the OL was garbage, it did suck. That doesnt mean him using over and over "5 sacks from scrimmage" in his "opinion" is incredibly stupid.
This post was edited on 8/12/19 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:34 pm to Chet Donnely
quote:
You two drama queens really that frustrated because a person has the audacity to think there might still be issues with the offensive line?
Another dumbass who hasn't read the thread
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
you expect people to read more than three pages of your incessant bitching? Would you feel better if I ask him not to disagree with you ever again, pumpkin?
Posted on 8/12/19 at 12:39 pm to Chet Donnely
quote:
you expect people to read more than three pages of your incessant bitching? Would you feel better if I ask him not to disagree with you ever again, pumpkin?
Seems like you and RB10 are in the same school of "Well who cares about all the relevant information, let's just roll with whatever little bit I know and shout it at the top of my lungs"
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News