- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Moscona said the CB’s played well?
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:47 pm
Per MM, Almost all passes were in the middle of the field, while outside coverage was good.
I’ve spewed out a LOT of negativity this morning because I saw literally nothing to be optimistic about. But maybe here is something? It’s hard to see this type of pass coverage on TV, cause they don’t show the whole field. So, anyone agree with this?
I’ve spewed out a LOT of negativity this morning because I saw literally nothing to be optimistic about. But maybe here is something? It’s hard to see this type of pass coverage on TV, cause they don’t show the whole field. So, anyone agree with this?
16
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:48 pm to bulldogger
The secondary and defensive line both looked solid
The linebackers were awful
The linebackers were awful
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:48 pm to bulldogger
They covered all the deep passes down field well. The defense as a whole gave up a lot mostly due to the soft zone scheme.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:48 pm to bulldogger
He is correct
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:48 pm to bulldogger
quote:
I’ve spewed out a LOT of negativity this morning because I saw literally nothing to be optimistic about.
This is pretty dumb because there were a ton of positives and when the CBs were defending 50/50 deep balls, it was almost always an incompletion.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:48 pm to bulldogger
I thought they actually did play well. FSU was picking apart our zone and maybe some of that was mental lapses. But anytime a pass was thrown on somebody in man the coverage was good. I was really concerned about our secondary going into the game but I actually think they are much better than expected. The defensive playcalling on third down was atrocious though.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:49 pm to bulldogger
They gave up a double reverse pass touchdown and a miraculous one handed catch for touchdowns. Other than that, they did look pretty solid.
Linebackers were terrible
Linebackers were terrible
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:49 pm to BigNastyTiger417
quote:
He is correct
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:49 pm to bulldogger
I thought the entire secondary looked good.
I was nervous about Brooks early but he settled in as well.
I was nervous about Brooks early but he settled in as well.
This post was edited on 9/5/22 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:50 pm to bulldogger
Bernard-Converse and Richardson played a lot better than I expected. Both looked really solid in man.
Their zone coverage needs some work.
Their zone coverage needs some work.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:51 pm to bulldogger
Yeah they did. I think defensive scheme hurt our secondary more than anything. The LBs have a long ways to go though. They left the middle of the field wide open all night long.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:51 pm to bulldogger
No one uses Moscone's as a trusted voice
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:52 pm to TigerinPurgatory
They didn't look bad. Hopefully they will learn to turn their head around.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:53 pm to Froman
quote:
there were a ton of positives
Ha. Right!
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:54 pm to bulldogger
Corners were great.
It was the communication between the linebackers and safeties that sucked
It was the communication between the linebackers and safeties that sucked
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:56 pm to bulldogger
Converse looked good. Garner looks like a Sunbelt corner. Got burned on the flea flicker. If there's one thing I will be critical of after last night it's the soft zone House is trying to run. Didn't cut it against FSU and it definitely won't cut it in the SEC. That shite needs to get canned immediately.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:57 pm to bulldogger
That bite on the flea was pretty weak
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:58 pm to bulldogger
Florida st had poor WRs. LSU held up for the most part on the outside. I don’t think this is a barometer test just yet
Middle of field was gashed. LBs and safeties were bad in coverage
Middle of field was gashed. LBs and safeties were bad in coverage
Posted on 9/5/22 at 1:59 pm to Imber
In Kelly and House’s defense, they took over a program with 38 scholarship players. Both starting corners transferred in the division and they are rolling with a McNeese and a ULL corner. Can’t expect press man to man with that. It won’t cut it, but it’s what we have this year.
Posted on 9/5/22 at 2:01 pm to bulldogger
I never thought I'd say this, but Colby Richardson was the best CB we had on the field last night.
LBs were atrociuos.
LBs were atrociuos.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News