- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:53 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
Posted on 10/9/25 at 10:53 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:Tunnel vision.
So the charger is breaking the law (no one disagrees.
If it all goes down the same with the exception fat arse funyon lady is not eating, paying full attention to driving, and following the truck at a safe distance guess what? We aren’t talking about it either.
Now which one actually hit and killed another driver again?
Without Lacy doing what he did she could still be eating funyons while driving (not against the law btw), listening to music while driving (not against the law either) and a man isn't killed.
So once again. Who is the originator?
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:07 am to Tigers4Lyfe
Basically "you arent cheating unless you get caught" and she wouldnt have got caught if not for KL's actions.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:08 am to sgallo3
quote:
Basically "you arent cheating unless you get caught" and she wouldnt have got caught if not for KL's actions.
So after all of your pandering you now accidentally admit Lacy’s actions caused the wreck.
Awesome.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:23 am to RB10
Its never been up for debate that Lacys actions led to her negligence being exposed, just whether or not he is responsible for her negligence.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:33 am to sgallo3
quote:
Its never been up for debate that Lacys actions led to her negligence being exposed, just whether or not he is responsible for her negligence.
Lacy is culpable in everything that his actions caused.
This is what you people don’t understand. Lacy doesn’t get off the hook because someone else was ALSO negligent.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 11:35 am
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:38 am to RB10
quote:
Lacy is culpable in everything that his actions caused
So you agree he is not culpable for the other drivers negligence, which he did not cause nor was he aware of.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:40 am to sgallo3
quote:
So you agree he is not culpable for the other drivers negligence, which he did not cause nor was he aware of.
Nope. Try and actually comprehend what I wrote.
quote:
Lacy is culpable in everything that his actions caused.
quote:
This is what you people don’t understand. Lacy doesn’t get off the hook because someone else was ALSO negligent.
I quoted them separately for you. Hopefully that helps.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 11:42 am
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:45 am to RB10
Yeah, Lacy didnt get off the hook. He is guilty of reckless driving, speeding, passing in a no passing zone.
But as you said, he is not culpable for others actions that he did not cause.
He didnt cause the other woman to be a negligent driver or to swerve into oncoming traffic. She made those awful decisions all by herself.
But as you said, he is not culpable for others actions that he did not cause.
He didnt cause the other woman to be a negligent driver or to swerve into oncoming traffic. She made those awful decisions all by herself.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:46 am to sgallo3
quote:
Yeah, Lacy didnt get off the hook. He is guilty of reckless driving, speeding, passing in a no passing zone.
Yet he was going in front of a grand jury for much worse crimes. You don’t know what he was or wasn’t guilty of.
This is another instance of you not being able to separate your opinion from fact. I’m almost positive you have no understanding of the difference, to be honest.
quote:
But as you said, he is not culpable for others actions that he did not cause.
He didnt cause the other woman to be a negligent driver or to swerve into oncoming traffic. She made those awful decisions all by herself.
Not what I I said and you’re still wrong.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 11:56 am
Posted on 10/9/25 at 11:59 am to LSBoosie
---
From what I gathered, Lacy was speeding in and out of traffic on a two lane road going south. Him doing this made a driver (gold truck) in the northbound lane slam on his brakes. The person behind the gold truck swerving into the southbound lane to avoid running into the back of the truck and that’s how the collision happened. Am I off base?
---
"Slam on brakes." I didn't hear any brakes.
"The person behind the gold truck swerving into southbound lane". I don't think she was swerving. She intently turned her vehicle in southbound lane b/c she was not paying attention to her surroundings. That's what I think.
Kyren Lacy was definitely driving recklessly for passing in a no passing zone and speeding. He didn't kill anyone but himself. RIP

From what I gathered, Lacy was speeding in and out of traffic on a two lane road going south. Him doing this made a driver (gold truck) in the northbound lane slam on his brakes. The person behind the gold truck swerving into the southbound lane to avoid running into the back of the truck and that’s how the collision happened. Am I off base?
---
"Slam on brakes." I didn't hear any brakes.
"The person behind the gold truck swerving into southbound lane". I don't think she was swerving. She intently turned her vehicle in southbound lane b/c she was not paying attention to her surroundings. That's what I think.
Kyren Lacy was definitely driving recklessly for passing in a no passing zone and speeding. He didn't kill anyone but himself. RIP
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:03 pm to DrD
This is the longest thread in TD history.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 12:42 pm to RB10
quote:
So after all of your pandering you now accidentally admit Lacy’s actions caused the wreck.
Awesome.
I regret that I have only 1 upvote to give you!
Posted on 10/9/25 at 2:40 pm to zuluboudreaux
quote:That fool got got.
I regret that I have only 1 upvote to give you!
And happy am I to have been the one to set him up.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 2:50 pm to RB10
Straigh from Google AI.
Understanding Fault in Louisiana Traffic Accidents
Louisiana's Fault System
Louisiana operates under a "fault" system for traffic accidents. This means the driver who is determined to be at fault is responsible for covering damages to other parties involved.
Comparative Fault Rule
Louisiana follows a "pure comparative fault" rule. This allows individuals to recover damages even if they are partially at fault for the accident. The compensation amount is reduced based on the percentage of fault assigned. For example:
Percentage of Fault Total Damages Recoverable Amount
20% $100,000 $80,000
50% $100,000 $50,000
99% $100,000 $1,000
Factors in Determining Fault
Several factors are considered when determining fault in a traffic accident:
Traffic Laws: Violations such as speeding or running a red light.
Driver Behavior: Reckless or distracted driving.
Witness Testimony: Accounts from those who saw the accident.
Police Reports: Official findings from law enforcement.
Physical Evidence: Skid marks, vehicle damage, and road conditions.
Steps to Take After an Accident
If involved in a traffic accident, follow these steps:
Check for Injuries: Ensure everyone is safe and seek medical help if needed.
Inform Authorities: Call the police and obtain a report.
Exchange Information: Share contact and insurance details with other drivers.
Document the Scene: Take photos of the accident scene and damages.
Contact Your Insurance: Report the accident to your insurance provider promptly.
Understanding Fault in Louisiana Traffic Accidents
Louisiana's Fault System
Louisiana operates under a "fault" system for traffic accidents. This means the driver who is determined to be at fault is responsible for covering damages to other parties involved.
Comparative Fault Rule
Louisiana follows a "pure comparative fault" rule. This allows individuals to recover damages even if they are partially at fault for the accident. The compensation amount is reduced based on the percentage of fault assigned. For example:
Percentage of Fault Total Damages Recoverable Amount
20% $100,000 $80,000
50% $100,000 $50,000
99% $100,000 $1,000
Factors in Determining Fault
Several factors are considered when determining fault in a traffic accident:
Traffic Laws: Violations such as speeding or running a red light.
Driver Behavior: Reckless or distracted driving.
Witness Testimony: Accounts from those who saw the accident.
Police Reports: Official findings from law enforcement.
Physical Evidence: Skid marks, vehicle damage, and road conditions.
Steps to Take After an Accident
If involved in a traffic accident, follow these steps:
Check for Injuries: Ensure everyone is safe and seek medical help if needed.
Inform Authorities: Call the police and obtain a report.
Exchange Information: Share contact and insurance details with other drivers.
Document the Scene: Take photos of the accident scene and damages.
Contact Your Insurance: Report the accident to your insurance provider promptly.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 3:05 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
So once again. Who is the originator?
The woman tailgaiting. The gold truck could have moved for a fricking turtle in the road and the result is the same. She was following too close and driving distracted.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 3:23 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:No. There are no laws for turtles but there are for humans.
The gold truck could have moved for a fricking turtle in the road and the result is the same
Posted on 10/9/25 at 3:31 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
No. There are no laws for turtles but there are for humans.
The point went right over your head. The gold truck could have done what he did for a dozen other reasons in the same way and the end result would be the same. The fat, funyon goobler was breaking the law by following too close and her driving distracted was a contributing factor to her over reaction and swerving into oncoming traffic.
Lacy broke the law prior to the accident by passing in a no passing zone but if the woman who killed the other driver was not tailgaiting she would have had time to slow down rather than swerve into oncoming traffic a panic. I would bet she never even saw Lacy’s car in the wrong lane because she was so tight to the truck.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 3:39 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:But in this case it didn't!
The gold truck could have done what he did for a dozen other reasons
It doesn't matter if the same thing would have happened absent Lacy's actions
And who is to say what could be seen in front of the truck even if she was following further back? I know some time you can't see shite and why I hate being behind vehicles that are bigger than mine.
Posted on 10/9/25 at 5:17 pm to Tigers4Lyfe
quote:
who is to say what could be seen in front of the truck even if she was following further back?
An eye doctor.
Your field of vision is wider the further back you are from a truck's tailgate.
I am constantly watching what's around me with the assistance of all mirrors and which vehicles are close proximity to me.
Popular
Back to top


2







