Started By
Message

re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation

Posted on 10/9/25 at 3:10 am to
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
20019 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 3:10 am to
I accidentally called you Vacherie Tiger. I apologize

The Arkansas lady is holding this event at MLK Park on Thibodaux on October 25 (day of A&M game) from 12 pm to 2 pm.

I don't think you'll be there in person.
Posted by Zamperini2014
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2018
839 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 4:51 am to
That is confusing as hell! He is guilty of speeding and perhaps leaving the scene of an accident. I think he took his own life because of the presumption of guilt from the start. No jury would find him guilty.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23652 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 7:47 am to
quote:

saw the charger and lost her shite. which maybe she shouldn't have, but she also shouldn't have to deal with a roaring charger coming directly at her at high speed in her lane.


If that were true I’d agree. The issue is, none of that is true.

She reacted to the truck, not the charger. She was too tight on the trucks arse to see the charger.


By the time she could see the charger it was in the proper lane.

Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25226 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 7:49 am to
quote:

By the time she could see the charger it was in the proper lane

A lot of people conveniently overlook this.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50516 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 7:59 am to
quote:

A lot of people conveniently overlook this.


That’s because there’s no way for him to actually know if it’s true or not.

Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25226 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:06 am to
If she couldn't see the car immediately in front of her to her left that she hit, then she couldnt have seen the car 100 yards behind it with the gold truck in front of her in the line of sight.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50516 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

If she couldn't see the car immediately in front of her to her left that she hit, then she couldnt have seen the car 100 yards behind it with the gold truck in front of her in the line of sight.


Panic does weird things to people. I don’t believe she said she never saw the Kia. She did say she saw the green charger coming head on.

Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25226 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Panic does weird things to people. I don’t believe she said she never saw the Kia

Panic doesnt excuse homocide. Ramming into a car head on that you see is a crime.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50516 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Panic doesnt excuse homocide. Ramming into a car head on that you see is a crime.


The cause of the panic matters though. Which is what you can’t get through your little noggin.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25226 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

The cause of the panic matters though.

For the green car to cause her to panic she would have to have been able to see it. For her to have been able to see it she had to have been able to see the car she drove headfirst into.

The story that she saw the green car and panicked and swerved left (into another car, killing someone and injuring herself) doesnt make logical sense.

It not making logical sense is why the AG took the rare move of doing her own investigation.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 8:25 am
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50516 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:24 am to
quote:

For the green car to cause her to panic she would have to have been able to see it. For her to have been able to see it she had to have been able to see the car she drove headfirst into.

The story that she saw the green car and panicked and swerved left (into another car, killing someone and injuring herself) doesnt make logical sense.


You do not know what she saw.

It doesn’t make sense to you because you want Lacy to be innocent. I have no problem believing she looked up saw the gold truck pulled to the side and the next thing she saw was a car coming head on to her. She panicked and swerved left.

I’m not trying to absolve anyone of guilt though.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 8:26 am
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25226 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:26 am to
Sure I do. She looked up from her funyons/phone and saw the truck in front of her breaking and swerved to avoid it.

quote:

It doesn’t make sense to you because you want Lacy to be innocent

Theres no world where lacy is innocent. We have him on camera driving recklessly.
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 8:27 am
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50516 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

It not making logical sense is why the AG took the rare move of doing her own investigation.


The AG is investigating because it’s a high profile case and to root out any potential missteps by the police. Not because of Funyun lady’s statement.

Don’t be fricking dumb.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50516 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Sure I do. She looked up from her funyons/phone and saw the truck in front of her breaking and swerved to avoid it.


You think this is what happened. Key word is “think”.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25226 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Key word is “think”.

Well when only one explanation makes sense, that is the one I will rely on until proven otherwise.

I could believe the explanation that she saw the green car 100 yards ahead, which would mean she would have also seen the Kia right in front of her in the line of sight to the charger, and then tried to turn left into the dollar general, if only I believed she thought she could somehow turn left and go "through" the other car.

Thats asking me to suspend a lot of disbelief when the much simpler explanation is she didnt see it, but rather wasnt paying attention until she looked up and saw the truck in front of her braking that forensics and the gold truck driver have her tagged as "tailgating"
This post was edited on 10/9/25 at 8:45 am
Posted by yaherrdme
The Place to Be
Member since Feb 2004
5877 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:46 am to
quote:

driver of the gold truck did not slam on his brakes (he’s on video saying so)


This is not what the gold truck driver said. He said " I aint skid mark or nothing, I wasn't even going fast"..... even if you are going slow you can still brake "hard" or abruptly or unexpectedly because someone is coming head on at you, but he never says he did not brake hard, just that he did not leave skid marks because he was not traveling at a high rate of speed

****
On a different note in the AD report and Ory's interviews, they always state Lacy's distance in yards/feet.. .but then always talk about funyuns distances in seconds and half seconds... Why not give Lacy's distances also in seconds, when Kyren was passing the 4 cars he was x seconds away from the gold truck in the other lane.... and vice versa... Funyuns was x feet behind the gold truck and funyuns applied her breaks x feet before the accident. Seems like that would make more sense, rather than use 2 different measurements when explaining the same incident.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50516 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Well when only one explanation makes sense, that is the one I will rely on until proven otherwise.


TO YOU

Only one explanation makes sense, to you.

quote:

I could believe the explanation that she saw the green car 100 yards ahead, which would mean she would have also seen the Kia right in front of her in the line of sight to the charger, and then tried to turn left into the dollar general, if only I believed she thought she could somehow turn left and go "through" the other car.


For the final time, you cannot say what she saw or recognized. Only she can.

quote:

Thats asking me to suspend a lot of disbelief when the much simpler explanation is she didnt see it, but rather wasnt paying attention until she looked up and saw the truck in front of her breaking that forensics and the gold truck driver have her tagged as "tailgating"


Bro

The simplest explanation is she saw the vehicle coming head on in her lane. She had no intention of turning, so the SIMPLEST explanation is her focus was straight ahead on a 2 lane road.

The rest of it, trying to GUESS what she was doing, is where it gets more complicated.

Saying your version is the simplest version is ignorant.
Posted by Tigers4Lyfe
Member since Nov 2010
6198 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:50 am to
quote:

A lot of people conveniently overlook this.
It really doesn't matter if she could see the charger or not. Doesn't mean a hill of beans.

As many people have tried to point out it was a chain reaction that started with Lacy and ended with a dead man.

Without Lacy's action NONE of it happens.

Period, end of story.

Bye.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25226 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:51 am to
quote:

always talk about funyuns distances in seconds and half seconds... Why not give Lacy's distances also in seconds

Because braking is based on reaction time.

Funyon lady was 0.5 seconds behind the vehicle in front of her, which doesnt give her enough reaction time to brake when she sees them brake.

Lacy isn't really tailing another car and is not forced to brake or swerve to avoid a collision.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
50516 posts
Posted on 10/9/25 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Lacy isn't really tailing another car and is not forced to brake or swerve to avoid a collision.




frick off.

He literally locked his brakes up and had to quickly get back into his lane. You can hear the screeching on all of the videos.
Jump to page
Page First 55 56 57 58 59 60
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 57 of 60Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram