- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is there any reason fans can’t crowdfund insurance policies for returning seniors?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 8:58 am
Posted on 12/12/18 at 8:58 am
Hear me out...
If any players are questioning whether to return for their senior years, an insurance policy against injury would be an enticement for return. The player would receive no benefit until after he completes eligibility (via season-ending injury).
I know this wouldn’t work, but why wouldn’t it?
If any players are questioning whether to return for their senior years, an insurance policy against injury would be an enticement for return. The player would receive no benefit until after he completes eligibility (via season-ending injury).
I know this wouldn’t work, but why wouldn’t it?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 8:59 am to MintBerry Crunch
Player would have to sign the insurance policy though while still eligible.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:00 am to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
I know this wouldn’t work, but why wouldn’t it?
Because the NCAA
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:00 am to MintBerry Crunch
I'm no NCAA rules expert, but you really don't see the issue with a bunch of boosters (fans) purchasing an insurance policy for a player?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:00 am to MintBerry Crunch
I’m not spending money on a college player to return.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:04 am to MintBerry Crunch
quote:
I know this wouldn’t work, but why wouldn’t it?
Why do YOU think it won't work?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:05 am to MintBerry Crunch
An insurable interest is required for insurance. The fans don't have one and cannot purchase it themselves. Therefore the policy would have to be purchased by the player or for the player. This is the same as giving the player the money to go buy an insurance policy. Thus, this is the same as giving a player money.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:07 am to lsu2006
quote:
I'm no NCAA rules expert, but you really don't see the issue with a bunch of boosters (fans) purchasing an insurance policy for a player?
For arguments sake, what's the issue?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:09 am to BiggerBear
quote:
An insurable interest is required for insurance.
The fans wouldn't be the beneficiary of the policy.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:10 am to moneyg
Fans don’t have an insurable interest in the player therefore the contract is unenforceable.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:12 am to moneyg
You can’t take out a policy on a player where you do not have an insurable interest in that player. It doesn’t matter if the player is the beneficiary.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:12 am to MintBerry Crunch
it would be considered 'compensation'
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:12 am to moneyg
Fans can’t really purchase anything for an athlete.
An insurance policy most likely would be an impermissible benefit
An insurance policy most likely would be an impermissible benefit
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:13 am to BiggerBear
quote:
An insurable interest is required for insurance. The fans don't have one and cannot purchase it themselves. Therefore the policy would have to be purchased by the player or for the player. This is the same as giving the player the money to go buy an insurance policy. Thus, this is the same as giving a player money.
This is incorrect. As a lawyer, I see some third party beneficiary contracts similar to these, but they are indeed rare
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:18 am to moneyg
quote:
For arguments sake, what's the issue?
An insurance policy is something of value.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:19 am to MintBerry Crunch
Other than an illegal extra benefit paid by boosters (which you would automatically be when you provide a benefit) that would trigger SEC and NCAA penalties and maybe even an NCAA investigation of your school I don't see a problem.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:22 am to MintBerry Crunch
These insurance policies aren’t some golden parachute if a guy gets hurt. They rarely pay out and when they do it useually is not a ton. They can compensate for dropping in the draft but not money lost down the road.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:25 am to asullivan12
That’s pretty interesting. I hear it’s a mess and very hard to get the insurance company to pay claims.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:27 am to MintBerry Crunch
Basically you want to try and bribe a 20 yr old kid to keep playing for the team you like?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 9:28 am to MintBerry Crunch
I'm pretty sure the player doesn't actually have to pay for the policy till his college career is over anyway, so they can pay for it with money off of his first contract/endorsement deal
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News