- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I’m feeling the SEC is still kissing Bama Arse!
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:27 pm
I predicted LSU’s permanent 3 opponents were going to be Ole Miss, Arkansas, and Alabama.
I predicted Alabama’s permanent 3 opponents were going to be Auburn, Tennessee, and LSU.
Now LSU’s schedule got a little softer with A&M instead of Bama.
But the SEC had to reach into the bottom of the barrel to give Bama Moo St!
How to say Vanderbilt without saying Vanderbilt!!!!!!
I had hoped that the addition of Texas and Oklahoma would reduce some of the SEC’s Bama Arse kissing. But I guess not.
I predicted Alabama’s permanent 3 opponents were going to be Auburn, Tennessee, and LSU.
Now LSU’s schedule got a little softer with A&M instead of Bama.
But the SEC had to reach into the bottom of the barrel to give Bama Moo St!
How to say Vanderbilt without saying Vanderbilt!!!!!!
I had hoped that the addition of Texas and Oklahoma would reduce some of the SEC’s Bama Arse kissing. But I guess not.
15
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:28 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
I predicted Alabama’s permanent 3 opponents were going to be Auburn, Tennessee, and LSU.
Even an unbiased fan with no dog in the fight could see that giving 1 team all 3 of thiose teams as permanent opponents isn't fair. Of those 3, LSU has the least historical importance and is the easy one to cut.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:28 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
I predicted Alabama’s permanent 3 opponents were going to be Auburn, Tennessee, and LSU.
Was NEVER going to happen. Just because you predicted it, doesn't mean Bama got it easy.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:31 pm to Gaspergou202
Why wouldn’t Alabama play Mississippi State. They’re 80 miles apart.
This post was edited on 9/22/25 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:31 pm to Gaspergou202
Might be because the schools aren’t that far apart.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:33 pm to Gaspergou202
Holy shite dude.
LSU is the ONLY school to not get a Big 6 team or one of Texas/Oklahoma as one of their permanents. Alabama got 2 of them.
Your argument is pretty weak brother.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:33 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:college football is changing...Moo State will have ability to reload each year with NIL and the portal. don't sleep on them.
But the SEC had to reach into the bottom of the barrel to give Bama Moo St!
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:33 pm to Earthquake 88
quote:
Might be because the schools aren’t that far apart.
The closest 2 SEC schools.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:35 pm to Gaspergou202
Look, they should've used geography as the only fair and direct method which would've given Bama- Auburn, Tenn and Vandy. They didn't and it got slightly harder for Bama.
All good. We got a tougher draw by not getting Moo State and getting A&M, but that will help with recruiting in Texas when we win and kept us from having the easiest three opponents out of the whole re-work.
All good. We got a tougher draw by not getting Moo State and getting A&M, but that will help with recruiting in Texas when we win and kept us from having the easiest three opponents out of the whole re-work.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:39 pm to gumbeaux
quote:
The closest 2 SEC schools.
Exactly. I was thinking the same thing. Didn’t know it was the two closest, but I knew they were by each other.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:44 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
I’m feeling the SEC is still kissing Bama Arse!
Yes it is.
Now defend the strength of schedule argument I am making.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:50 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:Bama already plays them every year as it is.
Even an unbiased fan with no dog in the fight could see that giving 1 team all 3 of thiose teams as permanent opponents isn't fair
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:51 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
Even an unbiased fan with no dog in the fight could see that giving 1 team all 3 of thiose teams as permanent opponents isn't fair.
I'm sorry but why are we doing fricking fair. Play the historic rivalries that make college football great. Teams go up and down so figuring out fair in 2025 is dumb... it wasnt long ago that Tennessee was an auto-win for bama
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:03 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
Just because you predicted it, doesn't mean Bama got it easy.
My prediction is only important for 2 reasons.
First. Traditional rivalries.
Alabama’s are Tennessee and Auburn.
LSU’s top 4 played opponents are Tulane (not SEC), Ole Miss, Mississippi State, and Alabama.
Second Strength of schedule
This was supposed to be based on the last 10 year records. The stated SEC goal was for the top half to play 2 top half schools and one bottom. And the bottom half to play 2 bottoms and one top.
Alabama. Tennessee had sucked for most of that time and only has shown life in the last couple. A moderate power. Auburn a moderate power at best.
They needed a strong opponent, or LSU. But the SEC gave them a dirt on the bottom opponent.
Bama gets 2 moderates and the 2nd or 3rd worst team. Moo St gets the number one team of the last 10 years. Fair to each no!
LSU faces Arkansas a moderate team, Texas A&M a moderate to almost good team, Ann Ole Miss a moderate to recently good team. Bama would have been more balanced.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:04 pm to Gaspergou202
The upper tier team that got off the lightest is Tennessee who has Bama, Kentucky, and Vandy.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:06 pm to Gaspergou202
I mean I’m not complaining about our three permanents. I’d rather have Vandy than A&M though.
But not having Bama every freaking year is going to be awesome.
But not having Bama every freaking year is going to be awesome.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:06 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
Why wouldn’t Alabama play Mississippi State. They’re 80 miles apart.
Because Bama has been the best team in the last 10 years and State holds Vandy’s hand at the bottom.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:06 pm to BrohemAlem11
quote:
it wasnt long ago that Tennessee was an auto-win for bama
Fwiw, the Vols werent the only team Bama beat on.
I wished we could have kept Bama-UF
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:10 pm to Gaspergou202
Aub and Tenn are historically better programs than A&M and Ole Miss they are also historically rivals of Bama stop pulling the victim card on everything. The schedule while somewhat boring makes sense in terms of most historically relevant rivals and an fairly even strength of schedule.
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:26 pm to Gaspergou202
LSU got a break for once. I’d rather play those teams than Auburn and Tennessee every year or Alabama and UGA every year.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News