- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If we had that usual elite LSU running back the offense would be satisfying
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:29 pm
Clyde and Nick are serviceable and can help you win games, but not having that game changing running back like Guice or Fournette limits what we did do on offense. Teams know we don’t have that home run threat running back so they don’t have to load any extra men in the box like they usually do. If we had Daryl Williams this offense would look a lot better. That Elite back would open a whole bunch up. It would help Burrow in the play action game, losen up coverage on receivers. And would make Burrow more of a threat to run
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:31 pm to broadcaster
Other offenses find ways to do well without elite running backs
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:32 pm to broadcaster
Emery, cain and Davis are coming.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:32 pm to broadcaster
quote:
but not having that game changing running back like Guice or Fournette limits what we did do on offense
So, maybe we run an offense that doesn't depend on a game changing RB?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:33 pm to broadcaster
I’ve been saying this since the Miami game. A back like Guice would’ve done wonders for this team this year. Brossette and Clyde are good but their vision and breakaway speed aren’t elite. Emery and Davis can change all of that with one stroke of the pen.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:33 pm to 23hella
quote:
Other offenses find ways to do well without elite running backs
Which ones?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:36 pm to Mohican
LA Tech put up points on LSU's defense. Do they have an elite back? Does Ole Miss? They have a damn good offense.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:37 pm to broadcaster
The fact that no one sees that Clyde is as good as any back we’ve had, is just mind numbing.
The reason we have two losses, and the reason we continue to struggle on offense, is that we are playing the wrong players.
22, 1, 2, 6, and 17 should be starting on offense. This WR time share situation is a drag on the offense. Play your most dangerous players at all times. We Historically struggle with this concept. We are the kings of letting seniority kill us when it comes to the starting lineups.
If the above was the starting line up, only being sub for fatigue, our offensive output would be much more dangerous and consistent.
The reason we have two losses, and the reason we continue to struggle on offense, is that we are playing the wrong players.
22, 1, 2, 6, and 17 should be starting on offense. This WR time share situation is a drag on the offense. Play your most dangerous players at all times. We Historically struggle with this concept. We are the kings of letting seniority kill us when it comes to the starting lineups.
If the above was the starting line up, only being sub for fatigue, our offensive output would be much more dangerous and consistent.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:39 pm to broadcaster
I really can’t keep up with what we need on offense.., I’ve been told:
-our OL sucks
-our RBs are average
-our receivers are slow
-our QB is average
Can someone tell me what we’ve been doing on the recruiting trail since 2015 to get to this point? Orgeron and Ensminger didn’t start their jobs at LSU this year.
-our OL sucks
-our RBs are average
-our receivers are slow
-our QB is average
Can someone tell me what we’ve been doing on the recruiting trail since 2015 to get to this point? Orgeron and Ensminger didn’t start their jobs at LSU this year.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:39 pm to idoubleu
quote:
he fact that no one sees that Clyde is as good as any back we’ve had, is just mind numbing.
not even close my friend
he is good, but not elite like Guice and LF and HIll , and many many others...
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:43 pm to idoubleu
quote:
The fact that no one sees that Clyde is as good as any back we’ve had, is just mind numbing
Clyde is good but he's not close to elite. He's not hitting the hole at speed.
He lacks top end speed once he gets in the secondary.
He fights for more yards better than anyone I've seen.
He's hard to bring down.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:47 pm to broadcaster
Not in this max protection scheme against sabama. Remember how Fournette faired against sabamm? Les Miles had him running into a brick wall all night long. This ensminger offense is very much like that les miles offense was. Guice did have a bit of success last season at sabamm thanks to canada's scheme with the shifts and motions.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:52 pm to Mohican
quote:Uh about 80% of the top 25 teams in total offense
Which ones?
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:56 pm to 23hella
I think the point of this thread is to say that even with the same scheme and play calling we’ve seen all year, an elite back would’ve actually done pretty well.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:02 pm to jgriffith
The world doesn’t revolve around Bama. Sheesh.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:02 pm to MightyYat
And we'd still be 8 & 2.
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:03 pm to MightyYat
I know that, but again, our dinosaur scheme has been playing right into sabamm's hand and Florida's hand! We're 8 & 2 with or without a big time RB. We are Ensmingered!
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 11/12/18 at 10:04 pm to MightyYat
quote:
I think the point of this thread is to say that even with the same scheme and play calling we’ve seen all year, an elite back would’ve actually done pretty well.
If the scheme only works with a Fournette or a Guice, it’s a bad scheme
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News