- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How was the wiretap even legal?
Posted on 3/10/19 at 6:02 am
Posted on 3/10/19 at 6:02 am
I’ve been trying to research this, and everything I read seems to indicate that at least one party to a call has to consent to being recorded.
Even under the unconstitutional patriot act, it sounds like the gvt needs suspicion of something heinous like terrorism to wiretap citizens.
So unless Dawkins was willingly “wearing a wire,” how was any of this legal to begin with?
Even under the unconstitutional patriot act, it sounds like the gvt needs suspicion of something heinous like terrorism to wiretap citizens.
So unless Dawkins was willingly “wearing a wire,” how was any of this legal to begin with?
6
Posted on 3/10/19 at 6:55 am to ForeverEllisHugh
Any of you downvoters care to shed light on the OP’s question?
If anyone has any real insight I am also curious about the constitutionality of this situation
If anyone has any real insight I am also curious about the constitutionality of this situation
Posted on 3/10/19 at 6:56 am to ForeverEllisHugh
Have you ever heard of a search warrant?
Posted on 3/10/19 at 7:01 am to macatak911
Don’t copies of search warrants have to be provided to someone in position of authority on premises?
Asking because I don’t know
Asking because I don’t know
Posted on 3/10/19 at 7:32 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:With a warrant. Wiretapping is allowed if the police get a warrant from a judge, to which they have to provide evidence that a crime is probably being committed. It is, for all intents, a search warrant and what you obtain via the wiretap may be limited depending on the specifics of the warrant. It is done all the time.
So unless Dawkins was willingly “wearing a wire,” how was any of this legal to begin with?
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:00 am to ForeverEllisHugh
Siding with a cheating coach ( I love him but that's what he is) over the FBI. wow
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:06 am to kkv75
Like others has said much of what was in the wiretap wasn’t allowed in court. I think this is being put in the public for that exact reason. Taint the jury pool and see if they can force Wade to say something that would make it permissible in court. That’s why he’s got to sit quiet.
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:07 am to kkv75
quote:
Siding with a cheating coach ( I love him but that's what he is) over the FBI. wow
You been reading the news about the FBI?
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:11 am to kkv75
Because the FBI doesn’t do some shady shite huh?
And fit the OP... do you even know what this investigation is about?? It’s not about Wade it’s about Dawkins so no Dawkins wouldn’t wear a wire to incriminate himself in an investigation against him
And fit the OP... do you even know what this investigation is about?? It’s not about Wade it’s about Dawkins so no Dawkins wouldn’t wear a wire to incriminate himself in an investigation against him
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:55 am to purpgoldblood
This is how the surveillance of Trump campaign happened. It’s a link analysis surveillance.
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:59 am to kkv75
quote:
Siding with a cheating coach ( I love him but that's what he is) over the FBI. wow
The FBI is not after Wade. The FBI did not investigate Wade. The FBI did not even subpoena Wade as a witness. The FBI is not focused on Wade. The FBI couldn't give a rat's behind about Will Wade.
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:59 am to lsufan1971
Some of y’all need to go watch The Wire.
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:59 am to lsufan1971
quote:
link analysis surveillance
Is this what is referred to as the 2 hop rule?
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:59 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
So unless Dawkins was willingly “wearing a wire,
Posted on 3/10/19 at 9:00 am to Topwater Trout
quote:
Dawkins wouldn’t wear a wire to incriminate himself in an investigation against him
Unless they already had him and he cut a deal to stir up some more shite or just gather information for them.
Posted on 3/10/19 at 9:12 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
So unless Dawkins was willingly “wearing a wire,” how was any of this legal to begin with?
You need to follow the case a little more closely. They weren’t intentionally wire tapping Will Wade
Posted on 3/10/19 at 11:09 am to Howyouluhdat
That’s my point. Neither one of them consented and this wasn’t an issue of national security...
Posted on 3/10/19 at 11:37 am to purpgoldblood
quote:
Don’t copies of search warrants have to be provided to someone in position of authority on premises?
they need judicial consent
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News