re: Here is what I learned about JL today

quote:

---

Nobody on the team has a better arm than J.L.

---

is this not even debatable now?

I know I'm chiming in late and probably skimmed over a couple of posts, but when I read....

quote:

---

JL's main problems from last yr stemmed from lack of film study, which is a main area that he is focusing on.

---

...I didn't automatically assume that Lee's "lack of film study" was entirely due to his own negligence.

Seems to me it's quite possible that the coaching staff didn't allot the amount of time necessary... The RP to Hatch to JL transition and the resulting playbook amendments may have eaten away at time ordinarily used for fine tuning against an opponent. Of course JJ looked great against Georgia Tech - he had a month to prepare for a single opponent.

I think that all of this year's potential QBs will be benefiting from increased time in the film room.

I simply stated, "when was the last time a QB threw 4 INT's and his team still won the game"

a turnover is a turnover. I understand that.

I just made that statement, and hotrod mentioned LSU/UF 2005, but jamarcus didn't throw 4 INT's in that game.

I know LSU had 5 turnovers combined, but JR did not throw 4 INT's.

how is that hard to understand?

is it not correct?

quote:

---

No, you didn't.

---

you are like a ilttle child.

when was the last time a QB threw 4 INTERCEPTIONS and his team still won the game?

quote:

---

when was the last time a QB threw 4 INTERCEPTIONS and his team still won the game?

---

Tony Romo against the Bills.

Here is what i learned from actually doing research, instead of just stating my opinion. Last year, JL accounted for 76 points for the other team. And just to clarify what i meant by 76 points, i mean his turnovers either 1. getting returned for touchdowns, or 2. the ensuing possession from his turnover. 76 points! I wish someone would tell me of a time when another quarterback accounted for this many points and was allowed to play the next year. The problem with some posts not only on this board but on other boards is that while you have a good argument about why we shouldn't just give the starting job to JJ, i have yet to hear a good argument about why we should give the job to JT. There is none. So he completed some passes, so did JJ. So he played against good competition, so did JJ, even if you don't think arkansas is good, they are still in the SEC which means they have some athletes. And the comment that JJ had a month to prepare for the GTech game is a good argument. But he only had a week to prepare for Arkansas and he had about 10 seconds to prepare for Ole miss, and he only threw 1 interception. which accounted for 0 points. If someone has a good reason why JT should be the starter, please state it, if not shut up!

well, if the QB doesn't throw the INT, the offense won't have to tackle, now will they?

Freedom of speech. Good thing we have it so everyone can give their opinion. We can argue all day about the QB spot, but in reality:

No one here, on the staff or on the team knows at all who will start, who will be the QB as the season progresses, or who will play good, bad or average. It won’t be until after this season is over that those questions will be answered. And you can “BOOK THAT”.

quote:

---

Why? You really dont like what you have seen from JJ more than JL?

---

Stopped reading at this post, so not sure what's been said in the pages between, but...

I don't like JJ OR JL more than the other, nor either of them MORE than RS. I'd be one happy Momma if they all saw the field this year, at the Wiz's command, and they all played lights out!!