re: Hannigrif says Orgeron made Canada makes changes by game 3.

quote:

---

WHO was calling the plays in the MSU and TROY games?????????????????

---

Canada and Aranda

30 pages (5/29 7:06 pm) of ancient history discussion

quote:

---

How you expect me to link you to reality????

---

Just messing with ya dude... I knew what you were trying to say...…….

quote:

---

Wait, you actually think Orgeron was calling the plays?

---

No... BUT did you see the difference in how the offense was run between the BYU game and the MSU game... Don't try to tell me that things had not changed...…………..

quote:

---

BUT did you see the difference in how the offense was run between the BYU game and the MSU game..

---

Here

Exact same offense

quote:

---

30 pages (5/29 7:06 pm) of ancient history discussion

---

I don't recall ever hearing a Baton Rouge radio talk show host come out and say that Orgeron told Canada that he couldn't run 4 sides or QB runs. Obviously we all know about the shifts and motions because Orgeron said it himself.

If the other stuff I mentioned is ancient history then I apologize for bringing it up again.

quote:

---

The point I was trying to make is, if you're good at your job you get a long leash. 'Personal differences' are just an excuse to shite can somebody you either don't like or as an out in an at-will State to get rid of somebody who's underperforming.

quote:
I don't care either, but the assistant coach can't run around the practice field be openly insubordinate to the head coach in front of the player like Canada was supposed doing.


Sure they can. Somebody who has a healthy ego and is secure in their manhood doesn't mind their insubordinates challenging them. It can make everybody better. If your players or workers think that means they don't have to listen to you, then you can rain down Thunder on them and remind them who's boss. Ultimately you still have the power to hire, fire and bench people

---

Open insubordination is never ok. Canada failed his players twice.

First by putting players in a position to fail.

He could've done one of two things to alleviate the problems.

First he could've arranged for somebody, if not himself, to spend some extra time with the RSFr and Fr lineman to get them up to speed on the offense

Or


He could've simplified the offense somewhat to compensate for his failure to teach the kids his vaunted offense.


Canada did neither so as a result O was forced to take action.

O asked Canada to cut back on the pre snap motions due to the players not knowing what they were supposed to do. Canada response was frick you.


O was definitely in right to fire Canada.

Everything you said in that post is made up, here’s what actually happened start to finish.
Orgeron was told to hire a new OC he didn’t want to do that he wanted Ensminger so as we were running out of time Aranda mentioned Canada and Alleva hired him making Orgeron promise to allow his OC to run his offense. When that didn’t happen Canada went to Alleva and a meeting was called after Troy in which Canada and Orgeron got into a heated argument and Alleva told Orgeron to back off and allow Canada to run his offense. From that point on Orgeron was going to fire Canada and when the season wound down that’s exactly what he did period. You guys can makeup stories about this and that but what I just laid out is what happened and anyone who paid any attention knows it’s what happened.

Orgeron admitted to doing these things to Canada and Ensminger but his congregation is gonna sit here and deny it anyway. They live in a perpetual fantasy.

The shifts and motions are one thing. It's not ideal IMO, but the QB runs and 4 wide sets also is serious meddling to me.