- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CWS Finals (Best of 3)...LSU wins Game 1, Game 2 Sunday, 1:30 CT (ABC)...LSU leads 1-0
Posted on 6/16/25 at 4:37 pm to Saunson69
Posted on 6/16/25 at 4:37 pm to Saunson69
quote:
Do you know how many people in the world actually know this? People have more significant things to care about than the rules of if a pitcher can get a save or win in same game. In addition to no pitcher pitches a complete game anymore so this never happens. In my opinion it makes no sense. Doesn't matter if someone new comes in, a save is a save is a save. Leading by 3 or less and close out a win. Starting pitcher should be able to get a save.
How drunk are you? That’s not how it works. Save is a save. Starters have to leave while and a reliever has to come in to “save” the win.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 4:44 pm to Saunson69
quote:
Do you know how many people in the world actually know this? People have more significant things to care about than the rules of if a pitcher can get a save or win in same game. In addition to no pitcher pitches a complete game anymore so this never happens. In my opinion it makes no sense. Doesn't matter if someone new comes in, a save is a save is a save. Leading by 3 or less and close out a win. Starting pitcher should be able to get a save.
I’ve read some dumb stuff on this site but this is a top 5 candidate without a doubt! I would have liked to single out something in your post , but it was all horribly wrong and idiotic. It sounds like something a woman would say. Are you a woman? If so I apologize.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 5:09 pm to Saunson69
quote:
In addition to no pitcher pitches a complete game anymore so this never happens.
Again, you’ve never watched LSU baseball this season and it shows. Dumbass
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:52 pm to supersaints9
quote:
I’ve read some dumb stuff on this site but this is a top 5 candidate without a doubt! I would have liked to single out something in your post , but it was all horribly wrong and idiotic. It sounds like something a woman would say. Are you a woman? If so I apologize.
A save is a save is a save. If you throw complete 9 inning game and you come in 9th up 1-0 as a starting pitcher and close it out. That should be a fricking save as you are saving your team from losing. frick all y'all. I use logic. Simply trading out pitchers should have 0 effect on whether it is a save or not.
I 150% stand by that it is retarded to not give a pitcher a complete game that wins by 3 or less a Save. Because it is a fricking save.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:54 pm to Le Tenia
quote:
Starters have to leave while and a reliever has to come in to “save” the win.
And a complete game pitcher, what does he do? He saves the win in 3 run or less 9th inning. Absolutely dumb rule. Starting pitchers absolutely should be able to get saves. A save is a save is a save. A pitcher having continuity into the 9th should have zero effect on whether he remains or a new one comes in. A save is a save is a save. 150% stand by this.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 9:55 pm
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:54 pm to Saunson69
quote:
Gonna come back here to call out people on my post that thought it was dumb that I asked does Wood get a Win and a Save in that situation. Do y'all really have 0 idea that a pitcher that is up 3 in last inning and gets 3 outs without losing is considered a save? Like are ya'll really that clueless?
Just read this…holy shite!
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:55 pm to Saunson69
No it isn’t. Prime example of going down with the Titanic
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:55 pm to Sarge
quote:
No it isn’t. Prime example of going down with the Titanic
By MLB rules it isn't. But that defies the logic of what a Save is. I 150% stand by what I say.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:56 pm to Saunson69
You picked a crazy hill to die on brother. Call it a night
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:57 pm to Bayouboogaloocrew
quote:
Just read this…holy shite!
The fact most of you can't see the logic in this only fits the bill of this further.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:57 pm to Bayouboogaloocrew
quote:
You picked a crazy hill to die on brother. Call it a night
Again, makes absolutely zero sense a starting pitcher can't get a save if he comes into the 9th up 3 or less.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:58 pm to Saunson69
And that’s why the OceanGate went down. Same logic. See how that ties together
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:59 pm to Bayouboogaloocrew
I'm not being a sheeple aka a random set of MLB rules that changes like enforcing a pitch clock that was never used in the past, and I'm solely going off the target definition of what a save is. Come in with 3 run lead or less, and close it out. A starting pitcher with a complete game that wins by 3 or less, 100% fits that description.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 10:01 pm to Saunson69
You can use your brain to understand what the meat of what the definition of a save is or accept a nuanced edition that someone else "has" to come in to make it a save.
Just like a perfect game is a perfect game regardless if 1, 2, or 3 pitchers come in. Same should be for a save.
Just like a perfect game is a perfect game regardless if 1, 2, or 3 pitchers come in. Same should be for a save.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 6/16/25 at 10:04 pm to Saunson69
I don’t have the energy…you do you man
Posted on 6/16/25 at 10:05 pm to Saunson69
quote:
Just like a perfect game is a perfect game regardless if 1, 2, or 3 pitchers come in.
But it’s not
quote:
Same should be for a save.
The entire point of a “save” is a pitcher entering the game with a 3 run or less lead and “saving” it. Blatantly doesn’t apply to complete games as you’re suggesting.
You’re way overthinking this, and you’re wrong.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 11:35 pm to Saunson69
quote:get some rest
Saunson69
Posted on 6/17/25 at 7:15 am to Saunson69
Lettin the liquor do the thinkin again bud?
Popular
Back to top


1



