View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?
Posted by schwartzy on 3/15/19 at 10:02 pm321
I’ve never seen a school administrative body react in this way. Alleva is the biggest beta to set foot on LSU
re: Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?Posted by geauxtigahs87 on 3/15/19 at 10:03 pm to schwartzy
Because the 2010 Auburn administration cares more about winning than the 2019 LSU administration.
re: Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?Posted by TigerLunatik on 3/15/19 at 10:05 pm to schwartzy
Because there weren't transcripts released in a report of Chizik discussing it. It's almost impossible to find a money trail. The wiretap transcripts are damning if they turn out to be accurate.
re: Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?Posted by lsufball19 on 3/15/19 at 10:05 pm to schwartzy
quote:
Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?
Actually Auburn did suspend Cam, twice actually, but everyone was cooperative and he was reinstated before he missed any games.
quote:
During the separate investigations by Auburn and the NCAA, Newton was briefly ineligible twice for a possible violation of NCAA Bylaws 12.3.1 and 12.3.3, which both address whether or not Rogers acted as Newton’s agent by trying to set up the pay-for-play scheme or as his athletics scholarship agent by speaking to other institutions.
On Nov. 30, 2010, the same day Auburn sent its request for Newton’s reinstatement to the NCAA, athletic director Jay Jacobs also sent a letter banning Cecil Newton from Auburn athletic events, although Newton was present at the BCS National Championship Game.
quote:
There are no documents related to Newton’s suspension in the week leading up to the Georgia game because Auburn’s compliance office handled the matter over the phone.
In both cases, Auburn successfully argued that neither bylaw was violated by establishing Cam Newton was not aware of the scheme devised by Rogers and his father, had not agreed with either man to act as his agent, received no benefits from Rogers and did not pay Rogers to help his recruitment. Rogers also would have received no compensation if Mississippi State’s representatives had paid Newton.
In its conclusion, Auburn stated that “Newton should not be punished for the conduct of others,” a statement the NCAA upheld by clearing Newton last month.
This post was edited on 3/15 at 10:10 pm
re: Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?Posted by RogerTheShrubber on 3/15/19 at 10:07 pm to schwartzy
Was Chizik implicated? It was Mississippi State that was asked for money, not Auburn.
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
Advertisement
re: Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?Posted by Carville on 3/15/19 at 10:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It was Mississippi State that was asked for money, not Auburn.
So Newton’s Dad was barred from anything at AUBURN just because?
Goodness gracious you’re dumb.
re: Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?Posted by KosmoCramer on 3/15/19 at 10:20 pm to schwartzy
re: Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?Posted by DBG on 3/15/19 at 10:21 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It was Mississippi State that was asked for money, not Auburn.
re: Auburn didn’t suspend Chizik and withhold Newton for “abundance of caution.” Why are we?Posted by omegaman66 on 3/15/19 at 11:06 pm to schwartzy
quote:
Why are we?
Because our administration want to fire Will Wade. This isn't about doing what is right. They are searching for justification.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News