- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A little optimism regarding Canada's offense
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:53 am
Posted on 8/3/17 at 7:53 am
Canada's blocking scheme for this offense does not rely on using brute force to overpower the D line and just run straight ahead . The pre snap motion pulls defenders out of the box putting us in more one on one blocking situations and also it's a zone scheme. Blocking success this year will rely more on positioning and technique . Doubling up to the backers and sealing defenders . Opening up 1 on 1 tackling situations against Guice , bruising backs and speedy wideouts .
Also Canada has stressed he doesn't want Etling just bouncing around in the pocket . There are going to be bootlegs and quick passing plays to keep Etling protected . Yes losing O lineman is always bad but if our lineman are smart and on the same page we will be fine . We had a way better O line than Ole Miss but look what they did to Bama with execution. A nice zone scheme, spreading teams out and letting your playmakers make plays takes a ton of pressure off your line rather than "Hey be stronger and push them straight back."
The 99 yard Drive
Football is 80% mental .
Geaux Tigers
Also Canada has stressed he doesn't want Etling just bouncing around in the pocket . There are going to be bootlegs and quick passing plays to keep Etling protected . Yes losing O lineman is always bad but if our lineman are smart and on the same page we will be fine . We had a way better O line than Ole Miss but look what they did to Bama with execution. A nice zone scheme, spreading teams out and letting your playmakers make plays takes a ton of pressure off your line rather than "Hey be stronger and push them straight back."
The 99 yard Drive
Football is 80% mental .
Geaux Tigers
This post was edited on 8/3/17 at 1:45 pm
11
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:03 am to NamariTiger
Get this out of here.
We are doomed, the program is on an unavoidable down-swing, Coach O, Les Miles, Grimes, Stevens to WR, we're the worst team in the west and probably the SEC...
Just summarizing the other comments if this thread gets past 1 page.
We are doomed, the program is on an unavoidable down-swing, Coach O, Les Miles, Grimes, Stevens to WR, we're the worst team in the west and probably the SEC...
Just summarizing the other comments if this thread gets past 1 page.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:08 am to Wind
Lol, I know . I just wanted to try . We go through this shite every year a month before game day and people act like the sky is falling . Im going to have to start taking a pledge of no Tiger Rant 1 month before the season starts.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 8:49 am to NamariTiger
It's understandable why people are more than concerned about the line. Everyone and their brother knows it all starts up front and without a solid line a very average season is a real possibility. People are tired of average seasons, that's why LSU fired a coach with a title.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:00 am to Brazos
I just hope the offense line is better this year than last or it will be a very long season! 
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:02 am to NamariTiger
quote:
Football is 80% mental .
And 40% physical
Posted on 8/3/17 at 9:54 am to NamariTiger
That article perfectly showed how well Canada can hide o-line deficiencies. I am excite.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:14 am to unctiger4
hope my input helps to push this past page 1.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:17 am to s2
quote:
hope my input helps to push this past page 1.
Nope.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:20 am to NamariTiger
Calm down everyone, LSU added Justin Jefferson to the roster, all is well!
Posted on 8/3/17 at 10:25 am to NamariTiger
Left Tackle: KJ Malone, Austin Deculus, Saahdiq Charles
Left Guard: Garrett Brumfield, Ed Ingram
Center: Will Clapp
Right Guard: Lloyd Cushenberry, Donavaughn Campbell
Right Tackle: Toby Weathersby, Jakori Savage
This is the depth chart now. It isn't as doom and gloom as the posters on here make it seem. No, it isn't ideal, but Malone is the only Sr and the juniors aren't likely to leave early.
Left Guard: Garrett Brumfield, Ed Ingram
Center: Will Clapp
Right Guard: Lloyd Cushenberry, Donavaughn Campbell
Right Tackle: Toby Weathersby, Jakori Savage
This is the depth chart now. It isn't as doom and gloom as the posters on here make it seem. No, it isn't ideal, but Malone is the only Sr and the juniors aren't likely to leave early.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 2:51 pm to NamariTiger
I remember the melt before the 2011 season. Just saying. 
Posted on 8/3/17 at 4:40 pm to NamariTiger
Canada's offense and Guice are tailor made for each other.
I predict Guice has over 2000 all purpose yards this year and that we have more different players score touchdowns than any year since 2007
I predict Guice has over 2000 all purpose yards this year and that we have more different players score touchdowns than any year since 2007
Posted on 8/3/17 at 5:08 pm to NamariTiger
Thanks for the positive post. Reading tRant lately, you'd think the world's poles had shifted and it's axis reversed.
I believe the team actually looks to have as good a chance as any other year to be special. And I believe the offense finally has a real chance to be what we have wanted for the last decade- a team that can run the football and pass it, and use each to set the other up.
Go ahead and let the downvotes rain, but I refuse to see any negatives until Aranda and Canada give me something to be negative about.
I believe the team actually looks to have as good a chance as any other year to be special. And I believe the offense finally has a real chance to be what we have wanted for the last decade- a team that can run the football and pass it, and use each to set the other up.
Go ahead and let the downvotes rain, but I refuse to see any negatives until Aranda and Canada give me something to be negative about.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 5:43 pm to NamariTiger
That drive against a good Penn St D is just ridiculous. They made it look easy. I mentioned this in a previous thread that due to Canada emphasizing technique, scheme and mobility, we don't need the physically developed OL as much and can insert the younger OL with less drop off if they pick up Canada's scheme.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 5:58 pm to NamariTiger
Ya but it doesn't matter what offense u run if the DT's are blowing up your C & G's your offense is pretty much screwed.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 6:33 pm to TheHat7
quote:
Ya but it doesn't matter what offense u run if the DT's are blowing up your C & G's your offense is pretty much screwed.
We lost one starting lineman lol. Cushenberry will fill his spot and may end up being better, you never know. Our starting offensive line will be fine.
Posted on 8/3/17 at 6:36 pm to TheHat7
quote:
Ya but it doesn't matter what offense u run if the DT's are blowing up your C & G's your offense is pretty much screwed
Actually it does when you use over aggressive play to your advantage, redirection and motion to keep the D guessing. If they push up field and take themselves out of the play, who cares if they win the head to head battle.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News