- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
12 this year, 9 next
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:05 pm
We’ve all kinda accepted that we aren’t coughing up another 12 to buy out O. But if that’s out of the question, then What makes 9 a drop in the bucket?
Assuming this thing keeps going the same direction, is 3 million really what’s standing in the way?
I was in the “no way they cough up 12” camp, but, if the wheels fall off, I’m really starting to think they won’t have a choice
Assuming this thing keeps going the same direction, is 3 million really what’s standing in the way?
I was in the “no way they cough up 12” camp, but, if the wheels fall off, I’m really starting to think they won’t have a choice
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:06 pm to Schmelly
Exactly, get rid of him in November. We can't afford to have 3 years like this one, recruiting, etc. Will set us back too far.
This post was edited on 10/1/17 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:06 pm to Schmelly
8.5M isn’t happening either
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:07 pm to Schmelly
The potential real long-term damage to the program by keeping him for too long may necessitate a change later this year.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:08 pm to Schmelly
I hope I'm wrong BUT we got pussies running LSU that will keep O around because they think firing him after one year will send a bad signal PLUS the buyout. I hope I'm wrong but these frickers are incompetent.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:08 pm to Schmelly
We're going to go 3-9 and his arse is going to get canned
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:09 pm to LaBR4
I was under the impression that O was a bit of an experiment with a quick hook. I never looked at contract details until it became common knowledge after MSU. When he was hired, I thought it was 3 years @3.5 per. That guaranteed woulda been fine. 5? That’s the albatross. 5 ain’t an experiment. 5 is a life sentence
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:11 pm to Schmelly
How in the world do you give a coach that NOBODY would hire, let alone another Top 20 program, that kind of buyout?
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:11 pm to TakingStock
quote:
The potential real long-term damage to the program by keeping him for too long may necessitate a change later this year.
We understand this. Do the people making the decisions understand it?
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:11 pm to Schmelly
It's the Omer Asik of college football coaching contracts.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:14 pm to Schmelly
quote:
“no way they cough up 12” camp, but, if the wheels fall off
The wheels are already off buddy.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:20 pm to Triple Bogey
quote:
The wheels are already off buddy.
I agree, but I mean completely. He’s gonna finish out the year. So as of now, there is a chance it turns around. Only cause the games haven’t been played, lol. But, technically there’s a chance.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:27 pm to Schmelly
No way LSU is letting someone like O just walk away with 9 million. We need to face facts that he's going to be here in some shape or form for 3 years.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:31 pm to Schmelly
quote:
I was in the “no way they cough up 12” camp, but, if the wheels fall off, I’m really starting to think they won’t have a choice
The real question is what does it cost us to not pay the buyout sooner rather than later?
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:36 pm to shutterspeed
It’s 5, not 3. But the money ship already sailed. He won the negotiations. keeping him just because you screwed that up is basically throwing good money on top of bad. He’s gonna cost us more than that
Posted on 10/1/17 at 3:37 pm to sports101
I don’t know how to quantify that, but if there’s anyone in the admin that has a lick of sense, they’d be forecasting that shite somehow right now
This post was edited on 10/1/17 at 3:38 pm
Posted on 10/1/17 at 4:00 pm to PUB
quote:
How in the world do you give a coach that NOBODY would hire, let alone another Top 20 program, that kind of buyout?
One article claimed Alleva just modified the yearly pay of the contract he was going to offer Herman, all other terms remained the same.
If that is true it is mind boggling.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 4:08 pm to Schmelly
I asked in a thread WHY do colleges give such huge buyouts? People say to retain the coach. I get that.... But 12 mil to retain coach O.......? That's retarded.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 4:10 pm to PUB
People said for a while that Alleva stinks, he needed to go first. Rest of y'all had your collective heads in the sand. But he expanded the stadium! Yeah with money made by coaches he didn't hire.
Posted on 10/1/17 at 4:11 pm to AndyCBR
quote:
One article claimed Alleva just modified the yearly pay of the contract he was going to offer Herman, all other terms remained the same.
If that is true it is mind boggling.
If this is remotely true, we need to fire Alleva and the Law School Dean who hired him. This week.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News