- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Zavion Thomas
Posted on 1/14/22 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 1/14/22 at 12:20 pm
What is the word on Thomas? Looks like another Foucha or Brooks situation. The guy can play.
3
Posted on 1/14/22 at 12:24 pm to bearhc
He's an interesting piece to this.
If I was Kelly, I might pitch him on the idea of coming in as my return specialist and maybe playing cornerback. He could get on the field a lot earlier here at corner than at wide receiver, and if you took him it would make your numbers crunch a little easier.
But we need to offer him unless there's some "cultural" reason why we wouldn't want to.
If I was Kelly, I might pitch him on the idea of coming in as my return specialist and maybe playing cornerback. He could get on the field a lot earlier here at corner than at wide receiver, and if you took him it would make your numbers crunch a little easier.
But we need to offer him unless there's some "cultural" reason why we wouldn't want to.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 1:23 pm to macaoidh
We need more freshman WRs.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 1:58 pm to bearhc
What I meant by another "Foucha and Brooks situation" is that this is a very talented football player, and I am puzzled as to why he was not offered. I did not mean he should move to the secondary. Sorry for the confusion.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 3:35 pm to bearhc
No, I get it. But I was thinking independently that he might fit at corner based on our situation there.
We have this guy Rutledge out of Highland Park in Dallas that we offered last week who I would imagine would come, and if we sign him to go with Lacy and Ibieta that would fill out enough depth that we'd have 9-10 wide receivers without using Thomas there.
But if he tells you he'd only come as a WR I would still take him. Just to have him as a return man, it's worth it. He's legit as a return man on his tape.
We have this guy Rutledge out of Highland Park in Dallas that we offered last week who I would imagine would come, and if we sign him to go with Lacy and Ibieta that would fill out enough depth that we'd have 9-10 wide receivers without using Thomas there.
But if he tells you he'd only come as a WR I would still take him. Just to have him as a return man, it's worth it. He's legit as a return man on his tape.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 5:15 pm to tconle2
Gotta grab him.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 5:22 pm to macaoidh
LSU wanted to sign 4 high school WR. And that was before several left.
I don’t think they believe they are anywhere near full.
I don’t think they believe they are anywhere near full.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 5:24 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
Agreed.
It's going to leave a hole when the big 5 wr class leaves.
It's going to leave a hole when the big 5 wr class leaves.
Posted on 1/14/22 at 6:16 pm to bearhc
He has already signed and turned his papers in to Miss State
Posted on 1/14/22 at 6:17 pm to Cj_Jones2001
This is false. He has only committed
Posted on 1/14/22 at 6:18 pm to Cj_Jones2001
Doesn’t show that he’s signed on 247 site. Not saying that’s error proof.... but it’s typically correct and he’s committed, not signed
Posted on 1/14/22 at 6:23 pm to Cj_Jones2001
quote:
He has already signed and turned his papers in to Miss State
Nope
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News