- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Wouldn't recruiting and college football be interesting if
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:18 pm
Recruiting and signing athletes had a cap, sorta like the salary cap that you couldn't go over.
I know, I know it's a stupid idea but leveling the college playing field by only allowing a certain recruiting ranking number allowed to be signed. It would surely make the good coaches stand out and keep the dynasty teams at a minimum. It would also make following recruiting more interesting.
Have 1 recruiting service, sanctioned by the NCAA to rank recruits, 1-5 star and, for example, you are limited to a min/Max 70--100pts. So if you sign 25 4 stars, you met your Max. If you happen to sign 5 5 stars that equal 25, then you have to take less 4 stars or sign some 3 stars. Whatever the max would be, it may not be 100 and could be 90.
Or you can use the current ranking of total points and limit teams to signing no more than 300 pts in Team ranking points.
I know, I know it's a stupid idea but leveling the college playing field by only allowing a certain recruiting ranking number allowed to be signed. It would surely make the good coaches stand out and keep the dynasty teams at a minimum. It would also make following recruiting more interesting.
Have 1 recruiting service, sanctioned by the NCAA to rank recruits, 1-5 star and, for example, you are limited to a min/Max 70--100pts. So if you sign 25 4 stars, you met your Max. If you happen to sign 5 5 stars that equal 25, then you have to take less 4 stars or sign some 3 stars. Whatever the max would be, it may not be 100 and could be 90.
Or you can use the current ranking of total points and limit teams to signing no more than 300 pts in Team ranking points.
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 4:04 pm
9
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:21 pm to coondaddy21
man is this ever some loser arse talk
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:23 pm to coondaddy21
The alabama crimson tide has reduced this fanbase to demanding the college football equivalent of affirmative action.
Not only can lsu not compete nationally, lsu can't compete in it's own state.
There's no louder cry of uncle than this.
Not only can lsu not compete nationally, lsu can't compete in it's own state.
There's no louder cry of uncle than this.
This post was edited on 12/10/18 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:24 pm to coondaddy21
Interesting concept, I was actually thinking of ways that the NCAA can buck the Bama trend.
I guess my fear would be the subjectivity of the rankings. We would probably find ourselves complaining about how Bama players convienently get bumped down from 5* to 4* so they could sign more freak athletes.
I guess my fear would be the subjectivity of the rankings. We would probably find ourselves complaining about how Bama players convienently get bumped down from 5* to 4* so they could sign more freak athletes.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:27 pm to Gene Ween
It's no different than all professional sports. Teams like New England that have to draft well, find diamonds in the rough, and depend on great coaching to remain great.
It's accepted throughout pro sports, why not have a similar system in college?
I'm not advocating for it but the concept seems like something that would spice up recruiting and college football.
It's accepted throughout pro sports, why not have a similar system in college?
I'm not advocating for it but the concept seems like something that would spice up recruiting and college football.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:31 pm to coondaddy21
Considering recruiting rankings are so fluid and guys move up and down stars you wouldn’t be able to keep the numbers straight. You would have to get commitments from guys and project where they will end up in the final rankings. Unless you count the star they were at during commitment and if it changes after that you still get them at the same “price” but if they decommit then the “price” changes when the commit again.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:32 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
man is this ever some loser arse talk
The NFL does all sorts of things to produce parity such as the draft order and scheduling. Parity keeps fan interest up, something that is dying with Bama’s total domination of college football under Saban.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:35 pm to MontanaTiger
quote:
The NFL does all sorts of things to produce parity such as the draft order and scheduling. Parity keeps fan interest up,
this isnt the nfl, and saban hasn't dominated college football to the point we need to blow the whole fricking system up. college football is great because it actual has blue bloods and dynasties.
loser arse talk
Posted on 12/10/18 at 2:40 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
saban hasn't dominated college football
Really? They have won like five NCs in the last ten years, and made the playoffs every year. The also had the #1 recruiting class nine of the last ten years, and are on track to have one of the greatest classes ever this year.
If that’s not domination, I don’t know what is.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:06 pm to MontanaTiger
quote:
If that’s not domination, I don’t know what is.
take the whole quote, not a snippet.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:14 pm to jcole4lsu
It's not like other teams don't look at LSU (and Clemson, OSU, etc) and complain like how do WE get such great classes...remember, we get elite classes, too.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:15 pm to Gene Ween
quote:
Not only can lsu not compete nationally, lsu can't compete in it's own state.
Well, this is certainly untrue.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:18 pm to coondaddy21
quote:
Have 1 recruiting service, sanctioned by the NCAA to rank recruits, 1-5 star and, for example, you are limited to a min/Max 70--100pts. So if you sign 25 4 stars, you met your Max. If you happen to sign 5 5 stars that equal 15, then you have to take less 4 stars or sign some 3 stars. Whatever the max would be, it may not be 100 and could be 90.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:23 pm to coondaddy21
quote:
I know, I know it's a stupid idea
Repeat. Repeat. Repeat. And repeat some more.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 3:38 pm to Indiana Tiger
That’s some Marxist arse shite
Posted on 12/10/18 at 4:06 pm to BatonrougeCajun
quote:
That’s some Marxist arse shite
Are the professional sports leagues Marxist? Because they all do similar things to maintain parity. That’s how they keep the paying customers interested in their teams.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 4:52 pm to BatonrougeCajun
Regulations are already in place to limit scholarships to 85 total and 25 per year, this idea surely isn't Marxist.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 4:56 pm to coondaddy21
I’d just settle for every program being held to the same standard when it comes to recruiting. No more turning a blind eye when evidence has been handed to you. No more shutting down the little guy for doing the same shite you allow the big boy teams.
Posted on 12/10/18 at 5:14 pm to coondaddy21
Or what if you could only recruit players from your own state?
Posted on 12/10/18 at 5:23 pm to Yaboylsu63
quote:
Interesting concept, I was actually thinking of ways that the NCAA can buck the Bama trend.
My dad used to make the older boy fight on his knees to even it up. Perhaps we can get the NCAA to make Bama play without cleats or something...this is pitiful!
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News