Started By
Message

Rivals article summed up in a nutshell what has been LSU's recruiting Issue

Posted on 11/14/18 at 11:55 am
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
14437 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 11:55 am
Got this with the Emery Signing from Rivals.


Sure LSU gets a few true freshman like delphit/Adams/LF that have the Size strength and Toughness to play early.This class will have Stingley /Emery/thomas but for the most part alot of the classes over the last 5 years especially along the Lines have not had these types of guys.
To be honest looks like we are still lacking these big guys who have the size,strength,toughness and drive to make impacts as freshman and soph on the OL/DL. I mean in the last 4 or 5 years i can name one Dlineman/olineman that has made an big impact as a freshman and that is lawerence. I believe chasson had a chance before injury. Looks like Hines could be that Guy on the OL but in order to get LSU back to elite we need Ed oliver, M wilson types. I mention these two because i believe LSU finished 2nd on both of these guys and Ed O needs to start finishing first on these types of guys. LSU is literally a few impact OL/DL away from being back in the horse race again.
Posted by LSUBadger
Member since Jan 2014
2238 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:03 pm to
So Ed Ingram and Saadiq Charles didnt have the size, strength or toughness to make a strong impact last year as true freshmen?
Posted by RATeamWannabe
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
25942 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:04 pm to
Didnt see Hines listed, my bad
This post was edited on 11/14/18 at 12:05 pm
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12854 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:16 pm to
On the OL, especially OT, you're not regularly going to find impact freshmen.

Cam Rob started several games at OT for Bama and as did Tunsil at Ole Miss, and they struggled.

The key to the OL recruiting is pipeline. You can't skip years or under-recruit the numbers. You can't have too many "projects". And if you do both, it takes years to recover. As we can see.

So for OTs, you have to get one every year. It will take a year to get ready, and the good ones leave after 3, and there's 2 of them. Pretty simple math.
Posted by Lsujacket66
Member since Dec 2010
4785 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:19 pm to
This is kind of ignorant... frankly if you’re starting freshman on the OL then something is wrong. Take 5 a year, develop them, and start 3rd and 4th year players you’ve coached up.

OL is probably the biggest jump in difficulty from high school to college because of the mental leap
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12854 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:24 pm to
Edit: Roger that whitefoot, corrected

quote:

OL is probably the biggest jump in difficulty from high school to college because of the mental leap
this I agree with. I don't think people realize that OT, and center, are the most difficult and technical positions on the field behind QB.

It takes a special combination of attributes to be a high-level QB... same for OT. And those are both physical and mental attributes.

Another thing people don't realize is that except for QB the only other position that needs to know what everyone, including WRs, is doing on every play is the OL because the protection called is dependent of what everyone else is doing.

This post was edited on 11/14/18 at 12:31 pm
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11181 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:25 pm to
Hey Goon, I don't think he was meaning to reply to your post. I got confused as well, but I think he was calling the premise in the OP ignorant.
Posted by jembeurt
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
8804 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 12:39 pm to
So you could only think of ONE recruit on the lines that had a big impact his FR year, yet proceeded to name THREE in the last 3 years?!
Posted by texastigerr
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
8303 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 1:03 pm to
LSU has had high ranking classes mainly because we get skilled guys all over the field. Either the lineman we recruit on a consistent basis are over rated by the staff, do not pan out or do not get developed. We have a few that become great. But you can't have one that is great like Collins was and the 2, 3, or 4 that are average. We have not recruited enough extremely talented lineman to have depth to create a really good rotation on the dline and enough elite lineman that all pan out to form a really tough and talented line of scrimmage. We lose games because we lose the line of scrimmage. We don't lose games because of a lack of elite skilled players.
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11181 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

M wilson

You think Marvin Wilson made a big impact as a freshman?
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 2:03 pm to
Charles has struggled this year. He's also a converted guard so I'm not sure if he'll ever be athletic enough to play tackle.

I wish somebody would post the differences in the guard and tackle positions and what it takes athletically to be successful as a tackle. In particular a left tackle.
Posted by Dupont3
Keithville
Member since Nov 2011
1727 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 2:32 pm to
23 year old and d line vs 18 year old O lineman doesn’t work out. You can get away with it at the skill positions.
Posted by higgins
flowery branch, ga
Member since Dec 2009
7918 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 3:10 pm to
marvin Wilson ate too much of that maple fried chicken that got him to the Tallahassee dumpster fire. bet he regrets that. lost his coach and wont get a bowl.
Posted by ROPO
Member since Jul 2016
3072 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 4:11 pm to
There are 25 positions on a football team (including special team specialists). You don't need each specialist in every class but you do sign 25 players every year. As a good rule of thumb, we should be signing:

1 QB
2 OTs
2 OGs
1 C
1 TE
2 RB
2 WRs

1 F
1 Buck
2 ILBs
2 DT/DE
1 DT/NT
2 CBs
2 S

1.5 Specialists

1.5 Position of Need

Right now we have 20 commits, 2 of whom are specialists. Of the 22 position players, we have:

1 QB
2 RB
1 WR
1 TE
2 OTs
2 OGs
1 C

4 CBs
0 S
2 ILBs
1 OLB
1 DT/DE

Of course, this assumes that the recruiting services position assignments jive with what LSU plans (Devin White was a RB recruit, for example). Perhaps one of the 4 corners will end of at S, etc.

It's clear we need defensive lineman in this class but Sopsher appears intent on stringing us along.
Posted by larry289
Holiday Island, AR
Member since Nov 2009
3858 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 4:30 pm to
If he doesn't continue the alienation of N-LA, that's where the best are.
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11181 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

If he doesn't continue the alienation of N-LA, that's where the best are.


I'm not following you here. How is Orgeron continuing the alienation of North LA? Last year we signed 4 kids from North LA and three others from central Louisiana.

In 2017, there was not a lot of top talent up there, but Orgeron went very hard for the two kids who were (Mathis and Buggs).

In 2016 we signed 2 kids from Monroe (plus took Llayton Garrett as a PWO), and another from Shreveport.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
12854 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 5:37 pm to

So many things in this gif... I'll just go down the list.

1. Great example of how you defeat plus-protection (including max-protect). RB stays in, goes left, LB reads, goes O-right, sack.

2. Guice should've read the LB, just like the LB read him. He didn't follow, soon as he went towards LoS Guice should have shown a target to Etling and became the hot route on the blitz. We do the same mistake today.

3. This is the play that convinced me Charles should be an OT (he's at RG). He spins out and finishes his spin move with near perfect body positioning, lower body and upper.

4. That's the difference between an OG and OT athletically. A "limited" OG can make that move, but it isn't controlled enough to either have the balance (control momentum) to engage (w/proper leverage) AND/OR the upper and lower body are out of sync.

5. Mistake by Charles: he spun. While it was a wonderful move with great finish, he shouldn't have done it. He turned his back to the defender.

6. This is the thing about assignments: Was the LB coming through LoS his fault or the RT's?
- notice Charles chipped the DT before releasing to cover his gap in the zone blocking.
- So the RT knows he's got help inside, which is #1 priority
- so when LB comes over his outside shoulder, he should release to block him giving DT to Charles. So RT's fault right?
- No. Charles didn't keep his toe-2-hell of the RT, he was too far forward for to take on DT if release.

7. Charles recognized the problem, executed it incorrectly (by turning his back to LoS), but tried to fix it with an athletic move. However, DT was pushing in, and Charles encountered him at end of spin. It indicates quick reaction time and vision by an OL, which is absolutely required for OT. Just between him and the RT it was doomed to failure because of above.

8. As a tFR, and I'm using a little imagination here and a little experience, Charles knew the protection scheme. He knows Guice is going left. Otherwise, he wouldn't have released DT and been watching for LB to crash. He knew ahead of time what his 2 primary responsibilities were. Again, necessary for an OT.

9. Same as #8, he knew the protection scheme was broken down as soon as LB was moving towards another gap, and he recognized it immediately. Tried to recover with an ill advised move.

The difference between an OT and an OG....
- An OT and an OG move from point A to B in about the same amount of time
- An OT recognizes TO MOVE very much more quickly
- An OT has better posture and leverage when he arrives at Point B

It's not footspeed, it's about body control WITH footspeed. You have to get there first. When you get there, you have to be able to block, not just get in the way.

Oh, and watch Charles throw his guy down at the very end, probably out of disgust. Nice.
This post was edited on 11/14/18 at 5:44 pm
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 5:49 pm to
An offensive tackle has to be much more athletic than a guard. Most people don't understand this. As long as they're run blocking it probably doesn't make much difference but pass blocking probably requires more and that's where the lack of athletic ability shows.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
13941 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

To be honest looks like we are still lacking these big guys who have the size,strength,toughness and drive to make impacts as freshman and soph on the OL/DL.


Freshman linemen rarely have the size, strength, toughness, and drive to start and make an impact anywhere. It’s not a position like RB.
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4332 posts
Posted on 11/14/18 at 7:50 pm to
Yep
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram