- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Does no college season help recruiting?
Posted on 8/10/20 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 8/10/20 at 6:16 pm
I know nothing is official, but if the upcoming season were not to happen do you guys think this could possibly help recruiting as the last time LSU left the field it would be as champions. I could also see it possibly hurting us as we have a new DC and people want to see the offense without Brady. I was just interested as to what the opinion was. Most of y’all would know more than me.
Posted on 8/10/20 at 6:46 pm to JoeBurreaux
I'd say with local kids, yeah. With those from other states, probably not.
With no football (and online classes) kids prefer to stay close to home.
With no football (and online classes) kids prefer to stay close to home.
Posted on 8/10/20 at 7:07 pm to JoeBurreaux
I'd say no.
Visits are such an important thing AND our footprint is very broad geographically.
No or limited fans was already going to reduce the effectiveness of visits (assuming OVs for big games). Facilities, coaches, attending practice/film sessions, and of course the stadium and crowd all combine to make visits impactful.
But the game is the hook, that's what get's them in the door.
So no games, no hook.
Not that it would devastate recruiting, we'd all be dealing with the same issues. However, in addition to shrinking the geography quite a bit as mentioned above, it would also 'throw us off our stride'. Programs like Clemson, LSU, tOSU have a (dare I say it) process for these visits and recruiting in general.
Adjusting on the fly to re-invent a 'new process' in short order is at a minimum going to erase advantages schools like LSU have over schools like Iowa (just to give some basis for comparison). At worst it leads to a lot of disruption, 'errors', and disorganization which could lead to a loss of effectiveness well beyond erasing a margin over the competition.
Don't forget- recruiting IS a zero sum game. Every stud you land is one taken from the competition (some remote like an Iowa, some direct like UF).
Visits are such an important thing AND our footprint is very broad geographically.
No or limited fans was already going to reduce the effectiveness of visits (assuming OVs for big games). Facilities, coaches, attending practice/film sessions, and of course the stadium and crowd all combine to make visits impactful.
But the game is the hook, that's what get's them in the door.
So no games, no hook.
Not that it would devastate recruiting, we'd all be dealing with the same issues. However, in addition to shrinking the geography quite a bit as mentioned above, it would also 'throw us off our stride'. Programs like Clemson, LSU, tOSU have a (dare I say it) process for these visits and recruiting in general.
Adjusting on the fly to re-invent a 'new process' in short order is at a minimum going to erase advantages schools like LSU have over schools like Iowa (just to give some basis for comparison). At worst it leads to a lot of disruption, 'errors', and disorganization which could lead to a loss of effectiveness well beyond erasing a margin over the competition.
Don't forget- recruiting IS a zero sum game. Every stud you land is one taken from the competition (some remote like an Iowa, some direct like UF).
Posted on 8/10/20 at 7:33 pm to I20goon
I'd argue our footprint is the broadest of all programs. It wouldn't be an argument really but you know what I mean.
Posted on 8/10/20 at 9:32 pm to JoeBurreaux
We are going to have the same issues as everyone else! The instate schools that recruit well and have a big presence in their states will benefit the most, and that would include LSU.
Posted on 8/11/20 at 5:52 am to Dudebro2
Agreed. LSU also has the advantage of being the only power 5 program in Louisiana. Less instate competition for recruits than say Florida or Georgia or even Mississippi.
As luck has it, we also were fortunate this cycle in that we filled our needs out of state early before all hell broke loose. The real must-have targets left on our board outside of Tristan Leigh are all Louisiana guys.
As things stand, there are only 1 or 2 teams in the country even close to LSU when it comes to filling needs with the best players available. Coach O and company are rolling.
As luck has it, we also were fortunate this cycle in that we filled our needs out of state early before all hell broke loose. The real must-have targets left on our board outside of Tristan Leigh are all Louisiana guys.
As things stand, there are only 1 or 2 teams in the country even close to LSU when it comes to filling needs with the best players available. Coach O and company are rolling.
This post was edited on 8/11/20 at 5:57 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News