- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/10/09 at 7:02 pm to 9Fiddy
Let's go Kracka! 
Posted on 4/11/09 at 10:20 am to seawolf06
Holy shite that is huge. So now the controversy really begins. Looks like a USC/ND rematch and PSU gets left out.
Posted on 4/11/09 at 3:44 pm to Art Vandelay
Maybe we can fix the players leaving issues this year.
Posted on 4/11/09 at 5:52 pm to Art Vandelay
So many teams with 1 loss up there. More than just Penn St is getting screwed.
Posted on 4/11/09 at 10:10 pm to Kracka
Yeah, but Kracka don't forget my 1 loss came on a 22 hour advance when I got simmed. I am the only user who did not lose a single user game.
Additionally, I would like to lodge a formal complaint that commish had 14 games played to my 12, which is probably why USC is getting the nod over Penn State. I think ND had more games scheduled than me. I think we all need to be scheduled the same number of games with the exception of those who have a conf. championship. Because I am screwed 1st by getting simmed and 2nd by not being scheduled as many games.
Additionally, I would like to lodge a formal complaint that commish had 14 games played to my 12, which is probably why USC is getting the nod over Penn State. I think ND had more games scheduled than me. I think we all need to be scheduled the same number of games with the exception of those who have a conf. championship. Because I am screwed 1st by getting simmed and 2nd by not being scheduled as many games.
Posted on 4/12/09 at 7:50 am to relentlsspursuit
everybody has 12. USC has more because pac-10 schedule is locked plus 3 user games.
Posted on 4/12/09 at 9:39 am to relentlsspursuit
Relentless, I know your situation and I totally agree with your stance. I actually feel cheap taking FSU out of the NC game, because I know there is no way I beat them if I play user vs. user.
Posted on 4/12/09 at 10:08 am to Kracka
Someone else could switch to the Pac-10. That would make scheduling easier and give him a conference user game.
Posted on 4/12/09 at 11:41 am to seawolf06
OU wins the Cotton Bowl in a wild one 45-34. OU was down 24-34 with 2:09 left and only 1 timeout. For some reason the CPU decides it would be a good idea to throw. With 45 seconds left OU was up 45-35 after the CPU threw three "Jarrett Lee's". 
This post was edited on 4/12/09 at 11:42 am
Posted on 4/12/09 at 4:50 pm to seawolf06
I thought about taking Cal or UCLA this year but I knew I had a pretty good team at ND. I figure we only have 1 or 2 seasons left until we start the dynasty for 2010 so it would be hard to start building a program somewhere else.
This post was edited on 4/12/09 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 4/12/09 at 7:15 pm to Art Vandelay
I think we should just have dom give everyone of our players leaving a set amount of time offline and then let him restart the league. This seems to be the only way to make sure at least some of the players stay with the teams.
What does everyone think?
What does everyone think?
Posted on 4/12/09 at 7:53 pm to seawolf06
I don't understand what's going on. Are yall talking about players controlling the teams(us), or actual players that are on the teams we control?
Posted on 4/12/09 at 7:54 pm to Kracka
I'm talking about the "players leaving" portion of the offseason.
Posted on 4/12/09 at 9:08 pm to seawolf06
quote:
think we should just have dom give everyone of our players leaving a set amount of time offline and then let him restart the league. This seems to be the only way to make sure at least some of the players stay with the teams.
What does everyone think?
What I did with the SEC league was to save it as an offline dynasty, then talk to each leaving player for 20 minutes until they made a decision. Then I advanced to the next step, converted it back to an online dynasty, and sent new invites to everyone. The whole process took about 30 minutes and was not hard at all.
This post was edited on 4/12/09 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 4/12/09 at 9:35 pm to 9Fiddy
I am fine with that. Whatever yall want to do. It seems that it's only right.
Posted on 4/12/09 at 10:02 pm to Kracka
Dom said to take a vote here about it. I'm guessing he'd be ok taking a little extra time to keep some players.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 7:17 am to seawolf06
I agree w 9fiddy. That worked well in the SEC league.
In other news, Rose Bowl was a snoozer. Bowl games NOT against a user kinda blow. 50-7 Penn State beats Nebraska.
Returns QB, HB and star WR next year. (Assuming the players leaving can make my RB stay).
In other news, Rose Bowl was a snoozer. Bowl games NOT against a user kinda blow. 50-7 Penn State beats Nebraska.
Returns QB, HB and star WR next year. (Assuming the players leaving can make my RB stay).
Posted on 4/13/09 at 8:43 am to relentlsspursuit
I need to play my bowl game vs West Virginia. Cene if your on tonight let's hook up. I will text you later on this afternoon.
Posted on 4/13/09 at 6:49 pm to Kracka
thats fine just text me whenever you are ready. I have a user bowl game..sweet. I thought i was going to have to play Cornhuskers.
Page 8 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News