- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/22/12 at 5:49 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
... in a DLC you have to pay for
This just an assumption or is this really what is going to happen?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 5:59 pm to SundayFunday
Subways are basically confirmed for dlc. Bridges are up in the air as they are shown in art but not gameplay video.
I would guess very basic bridges in release and more with transportation expansion
I would guess very basic bridges in release and more with transportation expansion
Posted on 10/22/12 at 6:12 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
Looks like SC2013 is going to be a bust - big time.
Guess I'll be sticking to 4 then.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 6:20 pm to jcole4lsu
I mean are we going to have to Pay for that stuff later on in a DLC?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 6:54 pm to SundayFunday
absolutely.
the first DLC (which will be purchased, not given) will essentially complete the game.
to make it worse, they are thinking of pricing the game at ~$65 from the onset. add another $20-30 for the first DLC a few months later and this is just one big cash grab
the folks over at simtropolis are not happy overall
the first DLC (which will be purchased, not given) will essentially complete the game.
to make it worse, they are thinking of pricing the game at ~$65 from the onset. add another $20-30 for the first DLC a few months later and this is just one big cash grab
the folks over at simtropolis are not happy overall
Posted on 10/22/12 at 6:58 pm to jcole4lsu
What on earth prompted EA to straight up gouge for a series revamp?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 7:11 pm to sbr2
dunno. revenue issues i guess.
proper play for a SC5 would have been SC4 + hex grid + glass box engine
instead they went with a cash grab and online only play.
i still want to know what they plan on doing when they cant pay to keep the servers running.
proper play for a SC5 would have been SC4 + hex grid + glass box engine
instead they went with a cash grab and online only play.
i still want to know what they plan on doing when they cant pay to keep the servers running.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 7:56 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
dunno. revenue issues i guess.
Revenue Issues at EA? They've pretty much been whoring themselves out to the NFL to monopolize the Football Videogame Market.
I'll admit this looked like a massive improvement from SC4.
Terraforming: LINK Go to about 8:30.
Honestly, I thought Terraforming was complete shite, so I'm not going to miss it too much.
Posted on 10/23/12 at 9:21 am to 1fairbank
quote:
I'll admit this looked like a massive improvement from SC4
graphical? sure.
gameplay? maybe. from SC4 vanilla, sure. not from the "real" SC4 (which would include the basic major mod packs from the simtropolis community). that version of SC4's gameplay looks to far exceed what we will be getting in the release version of SC2013
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News