Started By
Message

re: Non-Official Battlefield 2042 Thread - I have retired as this thread's keeper...

Posted on 6/1/21 at 2:36 pm to
Posted by Devious
Elitist
Member since Dec 2010
29145 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 2:36 pm to
Tune in to watch a countdown? No thanks.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35587 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 2:43 pm to
yeah, if it's anything more than a 12 hour countdown, it will be a let down.


eta: i hope they bring back the OG BF3/4 theme song...

BF3 Teaser

BF3 MP Trailer

BF4 E3 Reveal Trailer

That "Seige of Shanghai" map was something else for 2013.
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 2:53 pm
Posted by SCgamecock2988
Member since Oct 2015
14056 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 2:48 pm to
Totally unrelated to BF6 but why the hell in my limited time on BFV is my winrate 32%? In a game of 32 v 32 you'd think it'd be closer to 50%. I only have 14 hours but I'm 12-25.. my K/D is 0.89 so not terrible.. I mean I know I suck but there are 31 other players. Most of the losses are completely lopsided as well. Gives me no motivation to ever boot up that game even though it's fun when a match is close (even with losing).
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 2:49 pm
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35587 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 2:55 pm to
from my experience, BF games are very objective heavy. i don't know how team are designated, but it's always been that way for me. its like one team doesn't play the objective because all they care about is kills. it's crazy. and it doesn't matter the game mode. rush or conquest, it's all the same.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65761 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 3:00 pm to
The good games aren't like that at all.

You get a squad and try to win the game just you 4 doing all you can. BF3/4 we never lost it felt like. Was rare. Was always so fun that a really good squad of 4 could win a 64 player match for their team.
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 5:33 pm
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33328 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

And please no BR mode.




Pretty silly request, if you don’t like the mode don’t play. Battle royale is the only reason a lot of people are excited about the game because they’re sick of Warzone.

And without a BR mode this game will be dead in months like the last couple battlefield games.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65761 posts
Posted on 6/1/21 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Battle royale is the only reason a lot of people are excited about the game because they’re sick of Warzone.


Lol no, BF fans don't give two shits about another battle royale and would rather have a good game so if that takes away from it leave that shite out. Way too many as is, stop pandering to kids and streamers.
This post was edited on 6/1/21 at 9:06 pm
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35587 posts
Posted on 6/2/21 at 12:33 am to
Teaser trailer confirming the reveal...

Twitter Video

Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33328 posts
Posted on 6/2/21 at 10:10 am to
quote:

BF fans don't give two shits about another battle royale


What a ridiculous thing to say.
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
8138 posts
Posted on 6/2/21 at 10:57 am to
Is your reading comprehension that bad? I wasn’t talking specifically about your post lol
Posted by SEC. 593
Chicago
Member since Aug 2012
4039 posts
Posted on 6/2/21 at 11:04 am to
I'm okay with having a BR mode, as long as both the MP and BR modes are both done correctly and one doesn't suffer because of the other.

Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35587 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 10:17 am to
battlefield dropped a new "teaser" video on twitter...

LINK
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123586 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 12:17 pm to
They could’ve just kept that to themselves
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65761 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 3:55 pm to
Does that mean stupid future shite? Because if so, I don't want it.
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13697 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 4:02 pm to
It’s 2042 so yeah there’s going to be future shite.
Posted by Afrojedi
Member since Jul 2017
473 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

It’s 2042 so yeah there’s going to be future shite.


Not too psyched about the future aspect but im hoping that only being 21 years off its not too outlandish.
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13697 posts
Posted on 6/7/21 at 11:58 pm to
Gives them room to use some creativity. Based off their last game trying to model their maps off of lesser known battles then falling wayy short on that, idk if creativity is great from Dice. But... in a weird way I trust them. They got gun play right in BFV the game just felt hallow compared to BF1 which felt like they put their all into it. If they get bring those two things together...
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123586 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:29 am to
quote:

Does that mean stupid future shite? Because if so, I don't want it.


Well supposedly it’s current weapons and stuff currently in development that will be used in the game.
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 7:20 am to
But not wildly stupid shite? Like wall running and jet packs and moon jumps? I mean if they give me a slick M4 because "future", that's fine. But I don't want a ray gun.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram