Started By
Message

Trade Offer--Watson for McKinnon

Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:37 am
Posted by SwampBooty
Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2015
738 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:37 am
PPR league, guy just offered me last night. I don't like the deal but wondering what I should counter with.
My team
QB: Deshaun Watson, Cam Newton, Jameis
RB: Howard, Kamara, Zeke, Lat. Murray
WR: A. Brown, Funchess, Dem. Thomas, M. Bryant, Amendola
TE: D. Walker, E. Engram


His team:
QB:Aaron Rodgers
RB: Bell, McCaffery, Mark Ingram, Powell, McKinnon
WR: Michael Thomas, Benjamin,Fuller, Agholor, Sterling Shepard
TE: Rudolph and Graham

Thanks fellas
Posted by bayouboy33
Lowcountry
Member since Oct 2006
2379 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:42 am to
That's really not a bad offer for you at all but I would counter for Ingram. If he offered you MCKinnon right away there's got to be room for negotiation
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34507 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:44 am to
I would hate having two mediocre running backs from the same team.. you’d be pulling your hair out trying to decide whom to start in a few weeks
Posted by SwampBooty
Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2015
738 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:52 am to
Any way you think I could substitute Cam in the trade? Lol I feel tied to Watson since I picked him up on Waivers prior to the week he started going off. Who would you rather have for the ROS
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82010 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 7:55 am to
You have three QBs, that's not needed.
See if you can get more, if not that's not a bad trade at all
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:13 am to
McKinnon > Ingram
Posted by SwampBooty
Sulphur, LA
Member since Sep 2015
738 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:16 am to
I'm aware of that, I wanted one for trade value. Jameis has been inconsistent and I was thinking about letting him go before being offered this trade. But now, I have a hard time convincing myself to trade Deshaun instead of Cam..
Posted by Tigereye10005
New York, NY
Member since Sep 2016
1592 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:24 am to
I think it's a pretty good trade as is You could maybe package Watson with Amendola or Murray and try to snag one of his top WRs instead of Mckinnon. But if you want an RB, it's a fine trade.

Posted by bayouboy33
Lowcountry
Member since Oct 2006
2379 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:40 am to
Lol we will agree to disagree
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 8:47 am to
Ingram outscored him by 10 points on the year and McKinnon has only been a thing for 2 weeks. Many more mouths to feed in Nola.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30542 posts
Posted on 10/17/17 at 9:09 am to
quote:

I would hate having two mediocre running backs from the same team.. you’d be pulling your hair out trying to decide whom to start in a few weeks

It's actually really clear who is better and should be started in fantasy. McKinnon is the better back to own and play. He gets equal carries, plus all the passing downs
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram