- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:22 am to reddman
Nobody expressed any objections regarding the new committee members, so I am going to go ahead and put those names down officially:
1. MWG
2. DJ30
3. LE
4. Swamie
5. Cwill
These five owners will be responsible for settling any rules disputes that are not specifically referred to in the rule book.
1. MWG
2. DJ30
3. LE
4. Swamie
5. Cwill
These five owners will be responsible for settling any rules disputes that are not specifically referred to in the rule book.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:23 am to reddman
quote:
These five owners will be responsible for settling any rules disputes that are not specifically referred to in the rule book.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:25 am to reddman
On to new rules...
Since it was just mentioned last week, let's discuss the idea of adding a 50 game limit to the current 150 IP limit for pitchers to retain minor league eligibility.
Are we prepared to vote on that as it is written above, or do we need to discuss further?
Since it was just mentioned last week, let's discuss the idea of adding a 50 game limit to the current 150 IP limit for pitchers to retain minor league eligibility.
Are we prepared to vote on that as it is written above, or do we need to discuss further?
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:27 am to reddman
definitely need to discuss more
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:28 am to reddman
Let me check something real quick. 10 min.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:30 am to rondo
quote:
definitely need to discuss more
Do it.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:32 am to reddman
now we are ok changing rules or settings that affect a teams built in strategy ?
Before we couldn’t change this or that “because I would’ve drafted or built my team differently”
Before we couldn’t change this or that “because I would’ve drafted or built my team differently”
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:34 am to reddman
I'm good with 50
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:35 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
now we are ok changing rules or settings that affect a teams built in strategy ?
Sure, if 2/3 of the owners are in favor.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:38 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
now we are ok changing rules or settings that affect a teams built in strategy ?
Before we couldn’t change this or that “because I would’ve drafted or built my team differently”
That was for a scoring category change. This is a little different, IMO. However, I do see your point.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:39 am to reddman
Wouldnt take place until next season, i assume
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:39 am to LSUBoo
quote:
Sure, if 2/3 of the owners are in favor.
TBM don't understand democracy.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:42 am to GynoSandberg
Yeah i don't think that would be something you could enact right away, since people have already made roster cuts with the current rules in place.
It does seem odd that an all star like Josh Hader can be toggled back and forth between the minors and majors. I feel like a tweak needs to be done to account for that in upcoming seasons (starting in 2020 of course).
It does seem odd that an all star like Josh Hader can be toggled back and forth between the minors and majors. I feel like a tweak needs to be done to account for that in upcoming seasons (starting in 2020 of course).
This post was edited on 10/10/18 at 9:43 am
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:43 am to reddman
The IRL rookie eligibility is 50 IP, so it is indeed high
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:48 am to GynoSandberg
quote:
The IRL rookie eligibility is 50 IP, so it is indeed high
It's also 130 AB, so we're pretty close to triple in both hitting and pitching.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:52 am to reddman
So the rule would be styled:
Minor League Eligibility:
Pitching: Career+Current regular season total IP is >= 150 or Career+Current regular season total game appearances >= 50, whichever occurs first. Makes ineligible if met.
Minor League Eligibility:
Pitching: Career+Current regular season total IP is >= 150 or Career+Current regular season total game appearances >= 50, whichever occurs first. Makes ineligible if met.
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:53 am to cwill
A player will no longer be minor league eligible once he reaches 50 career games or 150 career IP, whichever comes first.
This post was edited on 10/10/18 at 9:55 am
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:56 am to reddman
quote:
Rule Changes to Vote on
1. If an owner chooses to leave the league, he is permanently banned from the league from that point forward.
2. Create a minimum AB requirement each week (150 ABs?).
3. Eliminate the "or six starts" from the IP pitching requirement each scoring period, due to TB approach to starting rotations.
4. Make the minor league threshold for pitchers to also include a 50 game limit along with the current 150 IP limit.
1. Against
2. Against
3. For
4. For
Posted on 10/10/18 at 9:57 am to reddman
Yeah, I was just copying the style from the League Rules Summary on Fantrax.
Page 5 of 259
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News