- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge Amy Berman Jackson back in the news
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:35 pm
A federal judge has ordered the Department of Justice to release a March 2019 legal memo that advised then-Attorney General William Barr that the special counsel's investigation did not support prosecuting former President Trump, issuing a scathing decision that accused Barr and department lawyers of deceiving the public.
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson on Monday ordered the DOJ to release the legal memo in two weeks in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW).
The DOJ had argued in court that the full memo, portions of which have already been released, should be withheld because it fell under exceptions to the public records law for attorney-client privilege and deliberative government decision making.
But Jackson said on Monday that those claims were not consistent with her own review of the unredacted memo nor the timeline revealed by internal emails among top Justice Department officials.
Jackson, who was appointed to the federal district court in D.C. by former President Obama, wrote in a 41-page decision that "not only was the Attorney General being disingenuous then, but DOJ has been disingenuous to this Court with respect to the existence of a decision-making process that should be shielded by the deliberative process privilege."
"The agency’s redactions and incomplete explanations obfuscate the true purpose of the memorandum, and the excised portions belie the notion that it fell to the Attorney General to make a prosecution decision or that any such decision was on the table at any time," she added. LINK
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson on Monday ordered the DOJ to release the legal memo in two weeks in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW).
The DOJ had argued in court that the full memo, portions of which have already been released, should be withheld because it fell under exceptions to the public records law for attorney-client privilege and deliberative government decision making.
But Jackson said on Monday that those claims were not consistent with her own review of the unredacted memo nor the timeline revealed by internal emails among top Justice Department officials.
Jackson, who was appointed to the federal district court in D.C. by former President Obama, wrote in a 41-page decision that "not only was the Attorney General being disingenuous then, but DOJ has been disingenuous to this Court with respect to the existence of a decision-making process that should be shielded by the deliberative process privilege."
"The agency’s redactions and incomplete explanations obfuscate the true purpose of the memorandum, and the excised portions belie the notion that it fell to the Attorney General to make a prosecution decision or that any such decision was on the table at any time," she added. LINK
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:37 pm to Jbird
(I think)
This post was edited on 5/4/21 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:38 pm to Jbird
quote:
filed by the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington
quote:
Jackson, who was appointed to the federal district court in D.C. by former President Obama
quote:
A federal judge has ordered the Department of Justice to release a March 2019 legal memo that advised then-Attorney General William Barr that the special counsel's investigation did not support prosecuting former President Trump
So what's the real story?
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:40 pm to Jbird
quote:
But Jackson said on Monday that those claims were not consistent with her own review of the unredacted memo nor the timeline revealed by internal emails among top Justice Department officials.
#opinions
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:40 pm to ChineseBandit58
I'm guessing this is step one into reopening this crap against Trump. The Stasi is out for blood.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:41 pm to squid_hunt
Well, Garland must have agreed with Barr or the DOJ wouldn't still be arguing against the release. They would have stopped fighting and released the memo.
So I'm not sure what her angle is.
So I'm not sure what her angle is.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:43 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
So I'm not sure what her angle is.
Her angle is what I'm curious about. Everyone knows Orange Man Bad. Why would a leftist watchdog group be challenging that?
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:47 pm to squid_hunt
They want all the salacious shite to be put out in the public again.
Posted on 5/4/21 at 1:50 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
They want all the salacious shite to be put out in the public again.
Sowing discord?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News