- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Demaryius Thomas
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:02 pm
He has experience playing with Emmanuel Sanders. Would fit in quickly as a #2.
Claims to be past his achilles and hamstring issues
Said he is motivated to get 237 yards this year and retire with 10k yard career
He signed a minimum $1m contract with Patriots in 2019 that was back ended with performance incentives to prove it. Then he got hurt.
I wouldn't mind bringing him in to kick the tires to see if he is healthy and can play. We would only need him for a few games, then he would be depth.
Seems like a low risk veteran option at WR who would be a plug and play fix to the MT injury.
Claims to be past his achilles and hamstring issues
Said he is motivated to get 237 yards this year and retire with 10k yard career
He signed a minimum $1m contract with Patriots in 2019 that was back ended with performance incentives to prove it. Then he got hurt.
I wouldn't mind bringing him in to kick the tires to see if he is healthy and can play. We would only need him for a few games, then he would be depth.
Seems like a low risk veteran option at WR who would be a plug and play fix to the MT injury.
4
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:04 pm to Andynola
Rather have a guy already with the team who has had more reps/chemistry with our QBs than a random worn down vet. Just saying...
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:07 pm to Andynola
quote:
He has experience playing with Emmanuel Sanders.
I’ve watched football pretty much my whole life and I’ve NEVER heard this used as criteria for going after a particular receiver
What does the fact that he’s played with Sanders have to do with him being a good fit for this offense??
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:09 pm to Mr. Hangover
WASHED UP
A
S
H
E
D
U
P
A
S
H
E
D
U
P
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:11 pm to Andynola
I honestly think Taysom hill would be a better number 2 WR at this point than Demaryius. Expand Harris role as well.
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:11 pm to saints5021
THATSHITSNOT
F
U
N
N
Y
A
N
Y
M
O
R
E
F
U
N
N
Y
A
N
Y
M
O
R
E
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:22 pm to Andynola
This is a great chance for one of these guys the team has been bringing along for 2-4 years to finally step up. I'd much prefer to find out of these guys are legit than to bring in some dude with no history in the system for a four game stretch. We'll be fine
Posted on 9/16/20 at 1:42 pm to Mr. Hangover
When was it ever funny?
Posted on 9/16/20 at 2:25 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
I’ve watched football pretty much my whole life and I’ve NEVER heard this used as criteria for going after a particular receiver
Only time I have seen it make sense is if a player has character issues, and you have people currently on the roster that can vouch for the player. That is not the case with DT, that I am aware of.
Posted on 9/16/20 at 2:58 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Or maybe if he’s played with the QB before
Otherwise, you’re basically saying ‘let’s bring him in because he might be friends with sanders’
Pretty dummm IMO
Otherwise, you’re basically saying ‘let’s bring him in because he might be friends with sanders’
Pretty dummm IMO
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News