Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Hillary Clinton to "Honor" Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:46 pm
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:46 pm
How in the hell is this proper? Clinton is hosting a gala for a fashion show or some shite and she intends to "honor" a sitting Supreme Court Justice. I mean, I guess there isn't anything technically wrong with it as Hillary is no longer a government official, but for someone who is constantly threatening to jump into the presidential race and is currently being mulled by Bloomberg as a potential VP pick, this seems like a breach of the Separation of Powers to me.

quote:

Hillary Clinton will be celebrating Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at a gala hosted by fashion designer Diane von Furstenberg this week in Washington. 


And check out this list of other people to be "honored". It reads like a frickin who's who of who is about to be arrested.

quote:

Other guests expected at the female-focused bash include: model and “Project Runway” host Karlie Kloss, “To All the Boys I’ve Loved Before” actress Lana Condor, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), CBS News’s Norah O’Donnell, former longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin, CNN’s Brooke Baldwin and National Geographic Society Chairwoman Jean Case. 


The Hill with the deets. LINK
Posted by hogcard1964
Illinois
Member since Jan 2017
10364 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:48 pm to
Shouldn't RBG decline this?
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
39990 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:48 pm to
It already happened LINK
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Shouldn't RBG decline this?


I dunno. Apparently it already happened.

Like I said, that seems improper to me. Maybe one of our resident "legal experts" can weigh in.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24649 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Hillary Clinton will be celebrating Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at a gala hosted by fashion designer Diane von Furstenberg this week in Washington. 
Does "celebrating" = ritualistic sacrifices to Moloch in exchange for reanimation of a corpse?

Asking for a friend...
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
29862 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:51 pm to
hillary is so desperate for attention you could "almost" feel sorry for that murdering bitch
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61194 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:53 pm to
Hilldawg is going to honor RBG by not killing her
Posted by Spawn
Berlin
Member since Oct 2006
7048 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:54 pm to
With a massive scissor-palooza to follow right after.

Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

Hilldawg is going to honor RBG by not killing her



Which is only true because Clinton didn't win. Had she won, Ginsburg would be long gone by now and Loretta Lynch would be in her place.
Posted by 4x4tiger
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
2753 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:55 pm to
That old bag is gonna live to be 105, unfortunately
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80151 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:56 pm to
quote:


How in the hell is this proper? Clinton is hosting a gala for a fashion show or some shite and she intends to "honor" a sitting Supreme Court Justice. I mean, I guess there isn't anything technically wrong with it as Hillary is no longer a government official, but for someone who is constantly threatening to jump into the presidential race and is currently being mulled by Bloomberg as a potential VP pick, this seems like a breach of the Separation of Powers to me.


come on, man. You don’t really have a problem with this, do you?
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 6:57 pm to
I have a problem with the fact that this traitorous bitch hasn't already swung from her fricking neck.

So yes, I have a problem with this.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14409 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

Had she won, Ginsburg would be long gone by now and Loretta Lynch would be in her place.


Your timeline is off. Hillary would've nominated Lynch as a replacement for Scalia, whose timely demise allowed for the Biden rule to be implemented in refusing to approve the 0bama nominee.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80151 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 7:09 pm to
Ok, that’s fine, but the separation of powers rant was a bit much
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

Hillary would've nominated Lynch as a replacement for Scalia


My bad. You're correct.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

Ok, that’s fine, but the separation of powers rant was a bit much


I want to see this bitch hauled in to court if she so much as jaywalks, man. She's the worst of the worst. And with a bit of luck, she will replace Benedict Arnold in the history books as #1 traitor to the United States.

frick that bitch.
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17100 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

And with a bit of luck, she will replace Benedict Arnold in the history books as #1 traitor to the United States.

Aw man. Nobody wants to even think about Eggs Hillary, especially in the morning!


Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 2/20/20 at 7:21 pm to
*shudders*

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram