- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LaFourche Parish legal question
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:16 pm
Are any of you involved with a trial scheduled for the end of this month in LaFourche Parish or have knowledge about the issue? Upon my understanding a major oil company has allegedly constructed and is operating a pipeline across properties belonging to multiple owners without their authorization.
8
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:16 pm to CharleyLake
I'm involved.
What would you like to know?
What would you like to know?
This post was edited on 7/12/19 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:17 pm to CharleyLake
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:19 pm to jimbeam
This post was edited on 7/12/19 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:22 pm to CharleyLake
If they are, I'm sure they'll spill all the beans here bud.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:23 pm to CharleyLake
Get Gordon. Get it done.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:30 pm to CharleyLake
quote:
Upon my understanding a major oil company has allegedly constructed and is operating a pipeline across properties belonging to multiple owners without their authorization.
I would love to read up on this story if anyone has a link either now or after the trial.
The majors will usually do a risk review and have their legal folks go through things pretty good before just doing something silly like this.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 12:34 pm to The Mick
Is my understanding correct? Who are the parties involved? What is the legal issue here? When does the trial start? What do the plaintiffs hope to gain?
I am asking because I may have a similar situation that may require a judicial ruling at some point. Many thanks.
I am asking because I may have a similar situation that may require a judicial ruling at some point. Many thanks.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 1:11 pm to CharleyLake
quote:Let me start by saying that anything posted here is for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as admission or denial of any of the facts or causes in this case.
Is my understanding correct? Who are the parties involved? What is the legal issue here? When does the trial start? What do the plaintiffs hope to gain?
I am asking because I may have a similar situation that may require a judicial ruling at some point. Many thanks.
Do you agree to these terms?
Posted on 7/12/19 at 1:12 pm to CharleyLake
I have info, but its valuable information. Which means you'll have to pay first
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:40 pm to The Mick
Sure, Mick, I am not a lawyer, only someone who is curious about the case. I would not want you or anyone to disclose anything that would make you uncomfortable.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:42 pm to CharleyLake
quote:
I am asking because I may have a similar situation that may require a judicial ruling at some point. Many thanks.
Go get a consultation with a real lawyer you complete idiot.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 2:43 pm to CharleyLake
quote:
LaFourche Parish legal questionSure, Mick, I am not a lawyer, only someone who is curious about the case. I would not want you or anyone to disclose anything that would make you uncomfortable.
No but I do have a Beach House for sale in Alexandria if you're interested.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 4:24 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
What is it that makes a non-real lawyer a real lawyer?
What is the difference between an idiot and a complete idiot?
Please explain.
What is the difference between an idiot and a complete idiot?
Please explain.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 4:25 pm to CharleyLake
quote:
Upon my understanding a major oil company has allegedly constructed and is operating a pipeline across properties belonging to multiple owners without their authorization.
Lol what?
That would be incredibly stupid.
Posted on 7/12/19 at 4:30 pm to CharleyLake
Better Call Badeaux
Posted on 7/12/19 at 4:38 pm to TH03
Seemingly so. I know of a few instances where the stupidity was traced back to the land man or attorney who did the title research incompletely.
I think that the majors would explore settlement if it questionable but maybe they have the assets and can prove the burden of Acquisitive Prescription.
I think that the majors would explore settlement if it questionable but maybe they have the assets and can prove the burden of Acquisitive Prescription.
Posted on 7/22/19 at 1:41 pm to notiger1997
Did anyone provide you with information if the trial started today or who the litigants are?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News