- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelosi & Democrats Unanimously reject a motion condemning Illegal Immigrant Voting
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:24 am to ShortyRob
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:24 am to ShortyRob
quote:Go back and read his op-ed re Professor Kelly. Set aside preconceptions (which i find it increasingly-unlikely that you are capable of doing). Look at word choice, sentence structure, etcetera. All indicate intelligence and education. If you cannot see that, you are engaging in confirmation bias, based solely upon your disagreement with the SUBSTANCE of what he writes.
you were familiar enough with DiPrima to speak for his intelligence
It is increasingly-obvious that you are incapable of objective analysis on partisan topics.
2
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:27 am to AggieHank86
Your LARP skills are cracking, AggieHodor.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:29 am to ShortyRob
quote:It's rather boering
Hank just did what ALL liberals do.
He pulled out the "you're racist" card.......
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:29 am to AggieHank86
quote:
none of which address the question of whether LOCALS should make that call for themselves
At what point does one become a "local"?
Your point seems to imply that the people who have a history with regional issues have a better understanding of what policy may be best for them and their community or state.
If a swarm of strangers move in to alter this history...are they really representative of the
"local" situation?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:30 am to cajunangelle
Gee, I'm glad I'm not the angry white male type with a sub atomic semi automatic machine gun with a 480 round magazine of 200mm rounds emblazened with swastikas and dipped in pig's blood. If I were, those mofo's would need to be worried.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:30 am to cajunangelle
They need those votes to win
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:30 am to cajunangelle
This is really going to resonate well with flyover country.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:32 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Go back and read his op-ed re Professor Kelly. Set aside preconceptions (which i find it increasingly-unlikely that you are capable of doing).
I did read it.
Folks. I give you this link...................Hank read THIS link and concluded that there was little reason to question his credibility when speaking on Trump.
The dude cited conversations he had NEVER EVER WRITTEN ABOUT BEFORE despite these conversations supposedly occurring HUNDREDS of times over DECADES.......and he wrote it on the KOS..........complete with a pic of Trump with a dunce cap. Cause, ya know. THAT SCREAMS "no bias here".
And Hank just went, "yup, that sounds very reasonable".
quote:Because everyone knows that if I posted something from someone who makes Hannity look middle of the road........complete with an insulting cartoon of Obama...........and written on the right wing equivalent of DailyKos..........Hank would consider that to be "objective analysis"
It is increasingly-obvious that you are incapable of objective analysis on partisan topics.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 10:34 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:33 am to Dale51
quote:A completely valid question, that should indeed be addressed at the local level.
At what point does one become a "local"?
Your point seems to imply that the people who have a history with regional issues have a better understanding of what policy may be best for them and their community or state.
If a swarm of strangers move in to alter this history...are they really representative of the
"local" situation?
Should the citizens of Antelope, Oregon have been able to have implemented a length-of-residency restriction to exercise voting rights IN Antelope for Antelope local elections?
I submit that the answer is a clear “yes.”
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 10:36 am
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:37 am to dafif
quote:
You are one stupid mother.
Actually he is not stupid, he is simply taking intellectual dishonesty to the extreme. He knows better
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:41 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
The flyover country is forced to hear Biden say he will cure cancer.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:43 am to moneyg
quote:
Legal immigrants can't vote in Federal elections.
Not yet.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:49 am to cajunangelle
quote:
especially started by the Castro's in San Antonio, TX
frick the castros
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:52 am to AggieHank86
Stupid hypothetical just fyi.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 3:25 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
“Undocumented citizens”
ILLEGALS
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:27 pm to Gulf Coast Tiger
quote:
ILLEGALS
I was mocking people who use the phrase
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:31 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Isn't illegals voting against the law?
Yes
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:35 pm to cajunangelle
So you think with the stronger language included it gets through the senate?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 8:39 pm to cajunangelle
This is modern day gerrymandering on the part of the Democrats. Much like their push in Florida allowing convicted felons to vote or wanting the Electoral College dismantled.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:08 pm to cajunangelle
quote:They can't even condemn something that is illegal!!!
Isn't illegals voting against the law?
I suppose it is no wonder LBGTQXYZ'ers get a month while veterans only get a day.
Color me disgusted. Fuuk ALL you libtards. I can't wait to watch the muslims throw your asses off of a cliff.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News