Started By
Message

re: Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but McGahn Refused Order and Threatened to Resign

Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:36 am to
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:36 am to
quote:


So Mueller hasn't been fired, and all of this is basically heresay and you want Trump impeached? So that means you would be good with me going to your work and making something up and trying to get you fired. That makes a lot of sense.

Try it, try making up a false claim against someone. I've seen a ton of them - it's not as easy as you imagine.
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:40 am to
quote:

The West Wing confrontation marks the first time Mr. Trump is known to have tried to fire the special counsel.


Mueller Asst: Sir, they found the text messages

Mueller: FOR frickS SAKE SOMEONE TRY TO CHANGE THE NEWS NARRATIVE!!!

You clowns are shitting your britches.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 3:36 am to
Stating the fact the chief executive can hire and fire is a melt
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 3:37 am to
quote:

Mephistopheles
What are you babbling about? TDS is a helluva drug.
Posted by ArmyHogs
Your mom's house
Member since Feb 2012
9240 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 3:51 am to
quote:

That's insane. He should be impeached for even attempting to obstruct justice in such a way (but obviously Republicans are too cowardly to choose country over party). This is an absolute bombshell report from the Times.


based on WHAT?? unnamed "sources"? holy shite you people are stupid.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 3:54 am to
quote:

obstruct justice
What was he obstructing?

Damn, that orange bastard has sent the Left over the edge
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 4:14 am to
So the left for a big counteroffensive cannot come up with anything trump actually did but only something he may have thought about doing?

And this wasn't "leaked" back when it "happened" but now when the evidence against the "investigators" is piling up?

Why the frick wouldn't it have been "leaked" last June when it could have done the most damage?

These people are morons.
Posted by reggielendale
Member since Jan 2006
1103 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:20 am to
quote:

Why do you people lie? An actual Trump supporter is smart enough to know bullshite when he sees it. You are not nor have you ever been a Trump supporter. This story amounts to zero but the delusional left will eat it up just like they always do. They'll run around with their hair on fire. It's comedy gold.

I stand corrected. The story looks good for Trump. It is a very good optics.
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27463 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:27 am to
I'm confused on how "literally Hitler" allowed someone to:
- refuse an order
- threaten to resign
- keep his job
- not die at the hand of white supremacist Nazis.

Is Trump a dictator or not? I can't keep up.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:35 am to
quote:

This...does not look good.


If you are talking about the fact that y'all would run with a story about something that Trump might have thought about doing... but quite obviously didn't do... more than 6 months ago... as told by anonymous sources... as damning to Trump... yeah.. you are right. Y'all don't look good. You look... well... pathetic.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
47883 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:36 am to
Optics? that's what the left is reduced to. Optics. How about the optics that less people trust the media than the President. Those are some bad optics.
This post was edited on 1/26/18 at 7:37 am
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35923 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:45 am to
quote:

I'm confused on how "literally Hitler" allowed someone to: 
- refuse an order 
- threaten to resign 
- keep his job 
- not die at the hand of white supremacist Nazis. 

Is Trump a dictator or not? I can't keep up.

They won't answer that. They have spent the last year calling Trump a Nazi, a tyrant and a dictator. They have said he's impulsive, reckless and a danger to democracy. He has been called literally Hitler and Jeff Flake compared him to Stalin. With all that, the same Democrats on this board who have agreed with all these characterizations want you to believe Trump didn't fire Mueller because of hearsay about one man's attempt to resign.

And notice the chronology of stories. The Haberman piece at the NYT says "ordered" while the following pieces use less compulsory language. If Donald Trump had ordered the firing of Mueller, Rod Rosenstein wouldn't have a job right now, because he would have refused. The intellectual dishonesty of TDS is astounding.
This post was edited on 1/26/18 at 7:55 am
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7630 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:48 am to
You sheep are so predictable.

One side up in arms about a nothingburger of a story in some kind of hail mary pass that dirt somehow sticks to Trump. When if they would have got off their lazy asses and went to vote this wouldn't have been a issue.

The other side knows their marching orders though. "shout fake news at any bad press about our lord and shepard GE Trump" like the good little sheep you are.

Hmm what do you give sheep that do a good job

Tax cuts that will expire on the middle class
Promises of a wall
tweets of a man-child who acts like a five year old

I'm sure Trumpy will hook you up with something nice for following your marching orders
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64067 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 7:53 am to
quote:

The West Wing confrontation marks the first time Mr. Trump is known


hahahahahahha

Its just as known Decatur is actually V Putin!
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51614 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

So Mueller hasn't been fired, and all of this is basically heresay and you want Trump impeached? So that means you would be good with me going to your work and making something up and trying to get you fired. That makes a lot of sense.
he should have been impeached when he fired Comey. He was fired for not pledging total allegiance to Trump.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73403 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

he should have been impeached when he fired Comey. He was fired for not pledging total allegiance to Trump.

Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35923 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

he should have been impeached when he fired Comey. He was fired for not pledging total allegiance to Trump.

So how then should an incoming President fire a holdover FBI director? Do you even realize how ridiculous your statement is?
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 11Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram