Started By
Message

re: Intel to offer unbundled cable service through set-top box

Posted on 1/3/13 at 4:01 pm to
Posted by LSUAfro
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
12775 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

They already do this
Yeah I alluded to that. Not all providers do this now, but they all would certainly if these issues became more prevalent.
quote:

When I was in Australia the basic plan only went up to 20gigs
Yikes. Well, I'm not seeing Intel making a huge splash in Australia market w/ their product.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27813 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 4:15 pm to
Australia sucks for consumers. But you can pay for higher limits... as exists everywhere for anything...
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10251 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

There's got to be a catch hidden in it somewhere....



Bandwidth
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27813 posts
Posted on 1/3/13 at 10:44 pm to
I don't see that being an issue as HD signals currently run into the home on the same lines that bring us the Internet... Unless the provider chooses to.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
27624 posts
Posted on 1/4/13 at 7:52 am to
here are my 2 cents on the subject.

i work for one of the big 5 cable/satellite companies in the programming department and have for the past 8 years.

this sounds great in theory but i worry that they wont have every channel available. when companies negiotiate contracts they make the DirecTVs and Time Warners take all the channels, they bundle them so they HAVE to take them.

costs are getting out of hand. everyone is raising their rates next month so get ready.

DirecTV is going up 5% after going up 5% last Feb so thats 10% in 12 months. Their premium DVR fee is going to $23 a month. its getting out of hand.

this has been tried many times and failed. i really dont think it will be a game changer
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24118 posts
Posted on 1/4/13 at 7:57 am to
The mindset you just posted is why there hasn't been enough innovation in this sector. "This is the way is has to be" is a terrible excuse.

I'm going back to rabbit ears; $1200 a year for cable and internet is ridiculous for a decent package.
Posted by LSUAfro
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2005
12775 posts
Posted on 1/4/13 at 8:38 am to
It is ridiculous. I agree. But, any industry that has spent billions of dollars in infrastructure isn't going to lay down and watch their revenues trickle away. The truth is, for the forseeable future, I don't see any game changing or cost saving methods for the masses.

The tech savy and money conscious, sure, for the time being, but the the family of 4 in the suburbs where the wife wants to watch her HGTV, and E channel, and the kids are watching Disney, fox, and Nickelodeon...won't be saving money any time soon IMO.
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 1/4/13 at 8:41 am to
quote:

I'm going back to rabbit ears; $1200 a year for cable and internet is ridiculous for a decent package.


I did that 3 years ago. I don't miss cable at all.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27813 posts
Posted on 1/4/13 at 8:42 am to
quote:

but i worry that they wont have every channel available


But I don't need 120 channels. I need maybe 2 or 3 cable channels live, local channels, and a few shows that I can watch on demand.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 1/4/13 at 10:19 am to
quote:

I'm going back to rabbit ears; $1200 a year for cable and internet is ridiculous for a decent package.



I'm at $2000/mo but I really don't want to sacrifice the convenience of just turning on the cable box.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram