Started By
Message

re: Which would you buy out this cart? Recs on handgun

Posted on 11/24/12 at 8:02 pm to
Posted by Capital Cajun
Over Yonder
Member since Aug 2007
5525 posts
Posted on 11/24/12 at 8:02 pm to
Sig all day every day.
Posted by NimbleCat
Member since Jan 2007
8802 posts
Posted on 11/24/12 at 8:04 pm to
That is not a "Sig" like you think it is. That is an entry level gun with "Sig" stamped on the side.

Edit: that RIA is a cast frame not milled. You will not want to spend a lot on tricking it out.

This post was edited on 11/24/12 at 8:06 pm
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79098 posts
Posted on 11/24/12 at 8:07 pm to
Yep. I'd take the M&P 9. But, I am less and less a fan of .40 as I go on.

BTW, I'm a Sig guy. If you had a 229 or 226 it may be a different story. That said, for reliability, performance and value, M&Ps/XDs/Glocks are tough to beat.
Posted by Preys on Gumps
Wrigleyville
Member since May 2012
2099 posts
Posted on 11/24/12 at 8:24 pm to
What's the deal on 40 cal, keep hearing weird references to the round.
Posted by Geauxtiga
No man's land
Member since Jan 2008
34377 posts
Posted on 11/24/12 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

What's the deal on 40 cal, keep hearing weird references to the round.


Many swear the .40 has more stopping power. I've read a lot and am not sold though not sure, either.

Given the fact that the unexpanded diameter of a .40 S&W is less than 5 hundredths of an inch greater than a 9mm, I don't see how it can be THAT big of a difference.

Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79098 posts
Posted on 11/24/12 at 9:23 pm to
Moreover, I just don't enjoy shooting it. 9mm is cheaper, and tech has resulted in some very reliable SD/HD 9mm rounds. I'm trying to consolidate to calibers I enjoy shooting. Plus it is easier for keeping ammo on hand, obviously (and for reloaders).

Depending on the weapon, I generally prefer shooting .45 over .40 too. I know a lot of guys who feel similarly.

Your chances of ending up in a gunfight are obviously extremely small. The chances that you wouldn't be able to do the job with well placed 9mm JHPs and that a .40 round would be the difference is pretty much beyond measure. Get what you like and what you will practice with.
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11875 posts
Posted on 11/24/12 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

What's the deal on 40 cal, keep hearing weird references to the round.


It's a high pressure round and has more recoil impulse and muzzle flip than 9mm and .45 ACP.

I am indifferent to it. I think .40 and 9mm could both stop someone dead as long as you can connect. Accuracy is more important than the never-ending 9mm vs 40 vs 45 speech.

If you get the M&P, I would strongly suggest the .40 for the reason I mention earlier in this thread. But CZ also makes some sweet guns. Hell, just buy them all.
Posted by unbeWEAVEable
The Golf Board Godfather
Member since Apr 2010
13637 posts
Posted on 11/25/12 at 1:35 am to
CZ
Posted by Preys on Gumps
Wrigleyville
Member since May 2012
2099 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 7:10 pm to
CZ is in transit, I'll post a pic when the tac light and gun get together later this week.
Posted by Krypto
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Aug 2005
1476 posts
Posted on 11/27/12 at 10:00 pm to
CZ or Sig would be my first choices.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram