- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So where is the OSHA mandate?
Posted on 10/5/21 at 4:13 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 10/5/21 at 4:13 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Seriously, if BioNTech-Pfizer and Comirnaty are the same thing just fully approve BioNTech-Pfizer then this entire issue evaporates.
The vaccine being submitted for approval as Comirnaty is the reason for this piece.
Point being it’s not really an issue. It’s a legal quirk that uniquely appears here because of the speed all this was developed and the fact that the “generics” are still EUA while the name brand is fully authorized.
quote:
It only has a bearing in terms of employer basing their mandate on a fully approved vaccine
Eh. Maybe. My opinion is that the FDA is providing cover on that through the “interchangeable” language but it would make for an interesting case. However any litigation on that is going to be mooted by Comirnaty (or Moderna’s impending approval) becoming available
Confusing and nuanced? Definitely. Conspiracy or legal end-around? Nah. Just a product of the red tape our alphabet agencies have created over the decades.
This post was edited on 10/5/21 at 4:18 pm
1
Posted on 10/5/21 at 4:24 pm to Indefatigable
But when the rubber hits the road the doctor is still required to tell their patients that the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine is not an FDA-approved vaccine:
On one had you have the FDA saying the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine is not an FDA-approved vaccine, your doctor is required to communicate that information to you and then we have people in the MSM and the White House saying the "vaccine" (purposely not being specific) is fully approved.
The logic to go from "not and FDA-approved vaccine" to fully approved rivels string theory in terms of logic.
On one had you have the FDA saying the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine is not an FDA-approved vaccine, your doctor is required to communicate that information to you and then we have people in the MSM and the White House saying the "vaccine" (purposely not being specific) is fully approved.
The logic to go from "not and FDA-approved vaccine" to fully approved rivels string theory in terms of logic.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News