- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SpaceX Stacking Starship on top of Super Heavy Booster
Posted on 8/6/21 at 12:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 8/6/21 at 12:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
The rockets compared graphic doesn't really do starship justice. The S-5 did have the lunar module in there but the crew and cargo capacity of starship dwarfs what the S-5 was set up for.
2
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:09 pm to Wraytex
quote:
The S-5 did have the lunar module in there but the crew and cargo capacity of starship dwarfs what the S-5 was set up for.
The cargo compartment of Starship is 30,000 cubic feet. If you have a 3,000 square foot house with 10 foot ceilings, literally everything inside your house can fit into Starship. I'm not talking about just the objects. The entire volume of the house. EVERYTHING inside the walls, up to a maximum mass of 100 tons. In terms of volume and payload, Starship and a 747 Freighter are similar in their capabilities. They're almost identical in terms of volume, but the 747 lifts about 30-40 more tons than Starship. On the other hand, Starship very quickly passes up the 747 on its way to orbit.
Meanwhile, Bezos rides a dick a couple of miles up.
This post was edited on 8/6/21 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 8/6/21 at 1:34 pm to Wraytex
That is a good point.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News