- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wife of man who drowned in flooded car on Bluebonnet files lawsuit against LADOTD
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:11 am to goofball
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:11 am to goofball
Let's see where it goes. IMO, negligence should absolutely be considered.
The DOTD's (government's) job is to keep the roads safe. There are safety issues and federal highway regulations that are regularly ignored.
For example, probably 80% of guardrail and bridge rail don't meet current standards. Plenty of people have won lawsuits regarding this type of stuff, even people who were drunk and drove through guardrails.
Was this a freak flood or does that underpass flood with every rain? Are there pumps? Are they working? If it regularly floods, has something been put in place to warn drivers or does the government just ignore the problem?
I don't know the particulars are in this case, or if they have standing, but that's what the courts are for.
The DOTD's (government's) job is to keep the roads safe. There are safety issues and federal highway regulations that are regularly ignored.
For example, probably 80% of guardrail and bridge rail don't meet current standards. Plenty of people have won lawsuits regarding this type of stuff, even people who were drunk and drove through guardrails.
Was this a freak flood or does that underpass flood with every rain? Are there pumps? Are they working? If it regularly floods, has something been put in place to warn drivers or does the government just ignore the problem?
I don't know the particulars are in this case, or if they have standing, but that's what the courts are for.
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:12 am to wheelr
Remember the Memphis bridge? Day 1 I called it saying that crack had been there for a while and it must have been in previous reports. Then inspection footage from a drone was released from a year or two earlier, clearly showing the crack. They've fired the lead inspector but those reports(including photo/video) are supposed to go through a bridge engineer, then to the state headquarters, where it is supposed to be reviewed each step of the way. Arkansas is throwing one guy under the bus.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News