Started By
Message

re: Pedophile freed after jury determines photo evidence submitted by child's mother was faked

Posted on 9/28/21 at 7:05 pm to
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
151743 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 7:05 pm to
I don’t know if this has been discussed or not, but if she faked a picture or altered one that showed him in some sort of sexual act with a minor, couldn’t she be charged with possession of child pornography or something like that? Clearly there is some sort of “sexual” enough photo evidence that she had. Could that not constitute a charge like CP?
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6026 posts
Posted on 9/28/21 at 7:36 pm to
quote:

but if she faked a picture or altered one that showed him in some sort of sexual act with a minor, couldn’t she be charged with possession of child pornography or something like


Benefit of the child.

She goes to jail, kid goes to foster care.

Possession/creations in this case isn’t similar to other cases as the motivation wasn’t child exploitation but more system exploitation (revenge)

Also child crimes have high recidivism and recidivism is not really a concern in this case.

So it would cost the system and be more detrimental to the child and to punish her than to not punish her.

This post was edited on 9/28/21 at 7:37 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram