- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
5
Posted on 5/18/21 at 1:07 am to 632627
quote:For the record, this is a political term that is fairly recent. The term as used today originated in the 1930’s for political reasons, as a way for zionists (or the Jewish people in general) to gain favor with Christians. It’s a term that most Jews and Jewish scholars reject. None of this is controversial or conspiratorial.
There’s a reason why the term judeo-Christian exists, but Muslim-Christian does not.
This post was edited on 5/18/21 at 1:09 am
Posted on 5/18/21 at 5:34 am to 632627
quote:Yet Jesus is mentioned by name with reverence several dozen times( even more indirectly) in the Quran. More times than Mohammed is mentioned by name.
There’s a reason why the term judeo-Christian exists, but Muslim-Christian does not.
Judaism doesn't have such a favorable view of Jesus. "Judeo Christian " is a bs modern term.
Posted on 5/18/21 at 7:26 am to 632627
quote:
There’s a reason why the term judeo-Christian exists,
There is, but it's not the reason you think.
Posted on 5/18/21 at 2:37 pm to 632627
quote:
There’s a reason why the term judeo-Christian exists, but Muslim-Christian does not.
What is that reason?
Posted on 5/22/21 at 10:49 pm to 632627
quote:
There’s a reason why the term judeo-Christian exists, but Muslim-Christian does not.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News