Started By
Message

re: Breonna Taylor: it was not a no knock warrant

Posted on 9/23/20 at 4:26 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

quote:

But it was STILL a "no-knock warrant," because the document (by its own UNAMBIGUOUS language) AUTHORIZED them to enter the premises without knocking.
The Kentucky AG doesn't agree.
Here is the affidavit by which the warrant was obtained. In relevant part:
quote:

Affiant is requesting a No-Knock entry to the premises due to the nature of how these drug traffickers operate. These drug traffickers have a history of attempting to destroy evidence. have cameras on the location that compromise Detectives once an approach to the dwelling is made, and a have history of fleeing from law enforcement.
The judge issued the warrant as requested.

There is ZERO evidence that Breonna had surveillance cameras watching for the approach of cops. This was a lie. Likewise, there is no evidence that Breonna had any history of fleeing law enforcement. Another lie.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
55458 posts
Posted on 9/23/20 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

The judge issued the warrant as requested.

There is ZERO evidence that Breonna had surveillance cameras watching for the approach of cops. This was a lie. Likewise, there is no evidence that Breonna had any history of fleeing law enforcement. Another lie.


Do you think that applied just to Taylor and her residence?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram