Started By
Message

re: White House Ukraine Expert Vindman Sought to “Correct” Transcript of Trump Call

Posted on 10/30/19 at 2:12 am to
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14731 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 2:12 am to
quote:

This guy sought to alter the official record with his own interpretation of the call. Its absolute bull shite

You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true?

SMH.

What about the ellipses in the transcription?

Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 4:04 am to
Yes he would dipshit
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 5:24 am to
quote:


You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true


Because no one has ever lied to congress and again, he might very well believe his interpretation that doesn't change a thing. Also, you do understand, Trump didn't create or alter the Transcript, correct?

This guy sought to have it altered through the same official channels that created it and all other official POTUS communication transcripts and was told to pound sand.

This guy is a tds infected deep state clown who should have his career demolished as a result of his multiple breaches of military code...
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 5:27 am
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
13621 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:30 am to
quote:

You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true?


Seriously? Well let’s see

Would congress put a senile, stuttering, man who can’t remember major points in his own report to lead a special counsel investigation? A special counsel investigation that cost tens of millions and turned up absolutely nothing? A special counsel investigation that was filled with hacks that have expressed complete bias against the subject of the investigation? And this stuttering man embarrass himself and show himself as a horrible choice as the lead of the investigation?

Would someone be drug in front of Senate committee to testify against a Supreme Court nominee who cannot remember basic facts, name a single corroborating witness, identity the exact location, or provide anything else but a sobbing story in which she cant prove a single thing?

Would a congressional house committee chairman open a public hearing, and put on the record, a completely false account of a transcript that he admittedly replaced with his own lies? In a hearing related to the impeachment of a sitting President??

Would the head of the FBI be complicit in certifying a fake dossier as fact to a FISA court judge? To spy on a presidential campaign?

And you believe that is out of the realm of possibility?
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 6:31 am
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:41 am to
quote:

texridder


Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a believer. A true believer!!!
>
Posted by bayouvette
Raceland
Member since Oct 2005
4975 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:20 am to
quote:

What about the ellipses in the transcription?


:lol:

those damn ellipses..
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17905 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true?


Are you serious?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram