- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: White House Ukraine Expert Vindman Sought to “Correct” Transcript of Trump Call
Posted on 10/30/19 at 2:12 am to More&Les
Posted on 10/30/19 at 2:12 am to More&Les
quote:
This guy sought to alter the official record with his own interpretation of the call. Its absolute bull shite
You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true?
SMH.
What about the ellipses in the transcription?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 4:04 am to texridder
Yes he would dipshit
Posted on 10/30/19 at 5:24 am to texridder
quote:
You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true
Because no one has ever lied to congress and again, he might very well believe his interpretation that doesn't change a thing. Also, you do understand, Trump didn't create or alter the Transcript, correct?
This guy sought to have it altered through the same official channels that created it and all other official POTUS communication transcripts and was told to pound sand.
This guy is a tds infected deep state clown who should have his career demolished as a result of his multiple breaches of military code...
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 5:27 am
Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:30 am to texridder
quote:
You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true?
Seriously? Well let’s see
Would congress put a senile, stuttering, man who can’t remember major points in his own report to lead a special counsel investigation? A special counsel investigation that cost tens of millions and turned up absolutely nothing? A special counsel investigation that was filled with hacks that have expressed complete bias against the subject of the investigation? And this stuttering man embarrass himself and show himself as a horrible choice as the lead of the investigation?
Would someone be drug in front of Senate committee to testify against a Supreme Court nominee who cannot remember basic facts, name a single corroborating witness, identity the exact location, or provide anything else but a sobbing story in which she cant prove a single thing?
Would a congressional house committee chairman open a public hearing, and put on the record, a completely false account of a transcript that he admittedly replaced with his own lies? In a hearing related to the impeachment of a sitting President??
Would the head of the FBI be complicit in certifying a fake dossier as fact to a FISA court judge? To spy on a presidential campaign?
And you believe that is out of the realm of possibility?
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 6:31 am
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:41 am to texridder
quote:
texridder
Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a believer. A true believer!!!
>
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:20 am to texridder
quote:
What about the ellipses in the transcription?
:lol:
those damn ellipses..
Posted on 10/30/19 at 4:08 pm to texridder
quote:
Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true?
Are you serious?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News