quote:
It’s not about having a civilian go after the active shooter but more about deterring the active shooter in the first place. Less likely for the whole thing to happen in the first place if people are carrying.

I find it difficult to believe someone crazy enough to opt for a mass shooting is also logical enough to pick weapon free targets.

These people go for locations where there are tons of people in relatively tight spaces. Whether there are guns allowed or not doesn't seem to be a factor.

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by tigahbruh

Louisiana

Member since Jun 2014

2858 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:53 pm to slackster

quote:
difficult to believe someone crazy enough to opt for a mass shooting is also logical enough to pick weapon free targets.

These people go for locations where there are tons of people in relatively tight spaces. Whether there are guns allowed or not doesn't seem to be a factor.

Why is it then that over 90% of these incidents take place where guns are banned?
And if they were crazy enough to want to maximize casualty, wouldnt potential of armed opposition be one of the first considerations? Duh.

Crazy =/= stupid. In fact, it is often the opposite.

Your logic is weak.

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by PrivatePublic

Member since Nov 2012

17848 posts

Posted on 7/28/19 at 10:54 pm to slackster

quote:
These people go for locations where there are tons of people in relatively tight spaces. Whether there are guns allowed or not doesn't seem to be a factor.

Crowded places with guns: gun shows, police stations, shooting ranges, hunting clubs. Name me one mass shooting that has occurred at any of those. I'll wait.

Oh yeah, you're retarded.

3 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

O-T Lounge - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board