- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Central Park Five
Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:49 am
Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:49 am
Saw a 20/20 episode about this case. It's getting a lot of attention because I think a Netflix documentary is coming out that shows how 5 black/Latino teens were wrongfully convicted of raping and beating a white woman.
The 5 teens spent some time in prison and were awarded $41 million total as a settlement after a guy who was already in prison came forward years later and confessed, saying he did it alone.
Here's a synopsis: Wiki link to Central Park Jogger Case
Granted, there was no DNA evidence linking the 5 teens to the woman. But that was 1989..so would there be? The 5 all confessed, and some even bragged about it to family/friends, who made statements.
Doctors said they doubt that 1 person did the attack alone. Victim lost 80 percent of her blood and was in a coma for 12 days.
I guess what pisses me off is no one disputes that the 5 teens went to the park to beat and rob people. They robbed other people that night, one of them carried a pipe with him to knock people out.
And now they are millionaires and getting apologies and seen as being wronged by a racist system. I'm not saying they all had intercourse with her, I think only the 6th guy did that, but I do believe these 5 held her down and beat her (which is what some of them told their family/friends that they did).
The 5 teens spent some time in prison and were awarded $41 million total as a settlement after a guy who was already in prison came forward years later and confessed, saying he did it alone.
Here's a synopsis: Wiki link to Central Park Jogger Case
Granted, there was no DNA evidence linking the 5 teens to the woman. But that was 1989..so would there be? The 5 all confessed, and some even bragged about it to family/friends, who made statements.
Doctors said they doubt that 1 person did the attack alone. Victim lost 80 percent of her blood and was in a coma for 12 days.
I guess what pisses me off is no one disputes that the 5 teens went to the park to beat and rob people. They robbed other people that night, one of them carried a pipe with him to knock people out.
And now they are millionaires and getting apologies and seen as being wronged by a racist system. I'm not saying they all had intercourse with her, I think only the 6th guy did that, but I do believe these 5 held her down and beat her (which is what some of them told their family/friends that they did).
Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:51 am to lsubaseball78
I'm gonna make an even better documentary called the Central Park Six. Cuz six is better than just five.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:52 am to lsubaseball78
Jena 6 > Central Park 5
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:03 am to lsubaseball78
I saw it too. Freaking ridiculous. All they focused on was the one woman raped and beaten. Not the 30 plus thugs walking through at the same time jumping innocent white people. They confessed with their parents at their side.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:19 am to lsubaseball78
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/9/20 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:25 am to lsubaseball78
quote:
there was no DNA evidence linking the 5 teens to the woman. But that was 1989..so would there be?
quote:
Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist in prison, confessed to raping the jogger, DNA evidence confirmed his guilt, and he knew facts about the crime that only the offender could have known.
Obviously
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:27 am to lsubaseball78
quote:
Granted, there was no DNA evidence linking the 5 teens to the woman. But that was 1989..so would there be?
DNA was first used in a criminal investigation in 1986
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:37 am to AcetylCoA
Now this thread just got fun 
Posted on 5/26/19 at 12:10 pm to AcetylCoA
quote:
quote:
Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist in prison, confessed to raping the jogger, DNA evidence confirmed his guilt, and he knew facts about the crime that only the offender could have known.
Obviously
Yes, his semen was inside her because he actually raped her. What I'm saying is what all else would've been there from these 5 who didn't actually rape her but may have participated as accomplices. From what I've read, DNA testing 30 years ago required much larger amounts of DNA to get results, so the semen would've been a clear slam dunk, but other stuff that we would test today may not have been available.
Ultimately all they had were confessions and circumstantial evidence. Reminds me of the Scott Petersen case. No DNA evidence that he murdered his pregnant wife Laci, but he's on death row because of all the circumstantial evidence.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 12:14 pm to lsubaseball78
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:29 am
Posted on 5/26/19 at 12:28 pm to lsubaseball78
Of course this is becoming an issue again because Donald Trump took out full-page ads in the four biggest New York newspapers calling for the men (who were later determined to be innocent) to be executed.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 12:56 pm to Chuck Barris
quote:
Donald Trump took out full-page ads in the four biggest New York newspapers calling for the men (who were later determined to be innocent) to be executed.
He was literally Hitler even back then. We just didn’t know it bc he was a Democrat and got along with black leaders.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 2:25 pm to Chuck Barris
The Trump angle is exactly why this is coming to light again.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 2:57 pm to lsubaseball78
quote:
It's getting a lot of attention because I think a Netflix documentary is coming out
It is getting a lot of attention because election season is around the corner and the retards on the left are circling back to their favorite card, the race card.
Expect BLM to be visiting a city near you next summer.
RIP police.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 3:00 pm to Chuck Barris
quote:
Of course this is becoming an issue again because Donald Trump took out full-page ads in the four biggest New York newspapers calling for the men (who were later determined to be innocent) to be executed.
And there it is.
Retards gonna retard.
Posted on 5/26/19 at 3:01 pm to lsubaseball78
So it’s legal to beat and rape somebody if they’re white now?
Posted on 5/26/19 at 3:24 pm to Chuck Barris
What Trump actually said was that if they are guilty they should be executed..As did a lot of other people..But all we hear is Trump said they should be executed..
Posted on 5/26/19 at 3:46 pm to Athis
quote:Go and read the ad he took out in the papers. LINK
What Trump actually said was that if they are guilty they should be executed.
It doesn't contain any qualifying language like that, and he has continued to insist that the Central Park Five were guilty, despite the DNA evidence of the actual killer and the contradictions and inaccuracies in their original confessions.
Popular
Back to top

13










