Started By
Message
locked post

Central Park Five

Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:49 am
Posted by lsubaseball78
Dutchtown
Member since Feb 2019
27 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:49 am
Saw a 20/20 episode about this case. It's getting a lot of attention because I think a Netflix documentary is coming out that shows how 5 black/Latino teens were wrongfully convicted of raping and beating a white woman.

The 5 teens spent some time in prison and were awarded $41 million total as a settlement after a guy who was already in prison came forward years later and confessed, saying he did it alone.

Here's a synopsis: Wiki link to Central Park Jogger Case

Granted, there was no DNA evidence linking the 5 teens to the woman. But that was 1989..so would there be? The 5 all confessed, and some even bragged about it to family/friends, who made statements.

Doctors said they doubt that 1 person did the attack alone. Victim lost 80 percent of her blood and was in a coma for 12 days.

I guess what pisses me off is no one disputes that the 5 teens went to the park to beat and rob people. They robbed other people that night, one of them carried a pipe with him to knock people out.

And now they are millionaires and getting apologies and seen as being wronged by a racist system. I'm not saying they all had intercourse with her, I think only the 6th guy did that, but I do believe these 5 held her down and beat her (which is what some of them told their family/friends that they did).

Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
70569 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:51 am to
I'm gonna make an even better documentary called the Central Park Six. Cuz six is better than just five.
Posted by TigersSEC2010
Warren, Michigan
Member since Jan 2010
38158 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 10:52 am to
Jena 6 > Central Park 5
Posted by TigahTeeth
Georgia
Member since Feb 2016
6108 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:03 am to
I saw it too. Freaking ridiculous. All they focused on was the one woman raped and beaten. Not the 30 plus thugs walking through at the same time jumping innocent white people. They confessed with their parents at their side.
Posted by HogBalls
Member since Nov 2014
8893 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:19 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/9/20 at 4:18 pm
Posted by Mr Clean
Power I-Formation
Member since Aug 2006
53095 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:23 am to
Posted by AcetylCoA
Pasadena, California
Member since Nov 2009
2691 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:25 am to
quote:

there was no DNA evidence linking the 5 teens to the woman. But that was 1989..so would there be?

quote:

Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist in prison, confessed to raping the jogger, DNA evidence confirmed his guilt, and he knew facts about the crime that only the offender could have known.

Obviously


Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
179321 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Granted, there was no DNA evidence linking the 5 teens to the woman. But that was 1989..so would there be?


DNA was first used in a criminal investigation in 1986
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115573 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 11:37 am to
Now this thread just got fun
Posted by lsubaseball78
Dutchtown
Member since Feb 2019
27 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

quote:
Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist in prison, confessed to raping the jogger, DNA evidence confirmed his guilt, and he knew facts about the crime that only the offender could have known.

Obviously



Yes, his semen was inside her because he actually raped her. What I'm saying is what all else would've been there from these 5 who didn't actually rape her but may have participated as accomplices. From what I've read, DNA testing 30 years ago required much larger amounts of DNA to get results, so the semen would've been a clear slam dunk, but other stuff that we would test today may not have been available.

Ultimately all they had were confessions and circumstantial evidence. Reminds me of the Scott Petersen case. No DNA evidence that he murdered his pregnant wife Laci, but he's on death row because of all the circumstantial evidence.

Posted by puse01
Member since Sep 2011
3743 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 12:14 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/16/21 at 10:29 am
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
2880 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 12:28 pm to
Of course this is becoming an issue again because Donald Trump took out full-page ads in the four biggest New York newspapers calling for the men (who were later determined to be innocent) to be executed.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
83052 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Donald Trump took out full-page ads in the four biggest New York newspapers calling for the men (who were later determined to be innocent) to be executed.


He was literally Hitler even back then. We just didn’t know it bc he was a Democrat and got along with black leaders.
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52832 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 2:24 pm to
They did that shite
Posted by Big Jim Slade
Member since Oct 2016
6249 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 2:25 pm to
The Trump angle is exactly why this is coming to light again.
Posted by IllegalPete
Front Range
Member since Oct 2017
7182 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

It's getting a lot of attention because I think a Netflix documentary is coming out


It is getting a lot of attention because election season is around the corner and the retards on the left are circling back to their favorite card, the race card.

Expect BLM to be visiting a city near you next summer.

RIP police.
Posted by IllegalPete
Front Range
Member since Oct 2017
7182 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Of course this is becoming an issue again because Donald Trump took out full-page ads in the four biggest New York newspapers calling for the men (who were later determined to be innocent) to be executed.



And there it is.

Retards gonna retard.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
58465 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 3:01 pm to
So it’s legal to beat and rape somebody if they’re white now?
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
15713 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 3:24 pm to
What Trump actually said was that if they are guilty they should be executed..As did a lot of other people..But all we hear is Trump said they should be executed..
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
2880 posts
Posted on 5/26/19 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

What Trump actually said was that if they are guilty they should be executed.
Go and read the ad he took out in the papers. LINK

It doesn't contain any qualifying language like that, and he has continued to insist that the Central Park Five were guilty, despite the DNA evidence of the actual killer and the contradictions and inaccuracies in their original confessions.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram