Started By
Message

re: Yes, Trump really did say Mexico would write a check for the wall

Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:29 am to
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:29 am to
Yes

Mexico really is paying for it with the trade deal

God damn you assholes are a fricking anvil around the country’s neck.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:43 am to
quote:

Mexico really is paying for it with the trade deal
You people keep saying this, and we KEEP asking you to link to ANY legitimate, objective analysis comparing US government receipts under NAFTA versus prjoected receipts under this new deal.

And you CONTINUE to refuse to do so.

The response is usually something like “Orange Man said so. Why do you hate America?”

From Brookings:
quote:

Overall, the changes from the old NAFTA are mostly cosmetic. After a year and a half of negotiations, the three parties are going to end up with a new trade deal that looks remarkably similar to the old NAFTA. The main structure of the deal is largely intact; the biggest changes include higher rules-of-origin requirements for the auto sector, marginally greater U.S. access to the Canadian dairy market, and a scale-back of the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) rules. Thus we shouldn’t expect to see any dramatic economic effects from this deal—though if it convinces businesses’ that U.S. withdrawal from NAFTA is no longer on the table, resolving this uncertainty may lead to a small increase in investment

While this might be a (modest) short-term victory for the U.S., it risks undermining America’s long-term interests. The fact that both Mexico (on autos) and Canada (on dairy) took some small steps to appease Trump’s demands should not be surprising—the U.S. is more important to their economies than vice versa. Does this imply Trump was right all along, that previous American trade negotiators had been foolishly taken advantage of? Hardly. Indeed, while the U.S. gained a few minor, discrete achievements in these talks, Trump’s approach in the renegotiations have likely undermined broader long-term American interests. As a global power, the U.S. has sought to exert influence by investing in “soft power,” the ability to convince other countries their own interests in fact align with those of the U.S. In seeking to squeeze a few more dimes out of Canada and Mexico, Trump is telling America’s allies that they should no longer be so inviting of American power. Since Trump’s election, a number of U.S. allies have already taken steps to balance against U.S. power, and diversify their interests away from America. The U.S. approach to NAFTA’s renegotiation should only accelerate this trend..
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 6:08 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram