- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fox: Meuller Grand Jury extended 6 more months
Posted on 1/4/19 at 4:05 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
Posted on 1/4/19 at 4:05 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
This is relevant how? Its either proper or it isnt, and what random partisans say about it doesn't change that outcome.
It was proper for Starr. Rush limbaugh was all over Starr's cock in the 90s, as was Lindsey and a bunch of other Rs. the crimes that Clinton were accused of were much less of a deal than Trump.
quote:
it doesnt mean that Mueller gets carte blanche to drag this out for four years.
If it comes down to Mueller trying to nab Trump in perjury over a blowjob, I will be the first to say its absolutely bullshite.
Not to mention Meuller has far more indictments and convictions in 18 months than starr got in 4 years.
Posted on 1/4/19 at 4:13 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
It was proper for Starr.
Wrong
quote:
Rush limbaugh was all over Starr's cock in the 90s, as was Lindsey and a bunch of other Rs.
Literally could not be less relevant. What people who are paid to entertain say about something is completely irrelevant. I dont care what Rush Limbaugh says about ANYTHING, and neither should you. What partisans say about purely partisan issues also should not garner one bit of your attention. On top of that, even if those people's reactions 20 years ago were somehow important, it is STILL not indicative of the merits of either investigation, either Starr or Mueller.
quote:
the crimes that Clinton were accused of were much less of a deal than Trump.
The "seriousness" of an alleged defense does not dictate how long it takes to investigate something.
quote:
Not to mention Meuller has far more indictments and convictions in 18 months than starr got in 4 years.
So that is the measuring stick? How many indictments they can find and charge?
The Starr investigation was a travesty. It took longer than the 9/11 Commission Report. That is completely ridiculous, a waste of taxpayer money, and totally unacceptable.
Outside of Mueller uncovering a massive, inter-governmental conspiracy to hand the presidency to Trump, it needs to be wrapped up soon. It just simply does not take endless amounts of time to investigate something, not with the resources Mueller and team have available. Unless of course you allow the scope to expand endlessly, like these special counsels always do. And Im not saying things uncovered during the investigation but outside the SC's scope should be ignored. They shouldn't. But allowing them to drag on, while leaking constantly, does nothing but lead large segments of people to believe it is nefarious.
They need to investigate under the very narrow parameters of their enabling legislation and report back to Congress asap. Ancillary matters that they find should be referred to DOJ for complete investigation.
This post was edited on 1/4/19 at 4:18 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News